Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #203Re: Return-Receipt-To & Mailing lists
From: Steve Dorner
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 13:13
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 13:13
19 lines
1424 bytes
1424 bytes
In article <1992Dec29.075730.21796@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu>, tmetro@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Thomas Metro) wrote: > What should happen when crossing a gateway, and there is no equivalent to > a "Return-Receipt-To:" or "Read-Receipt-To:" on the other side? Should the > gateway send an appropriate message? That depends. If the gateway *knows* that the mail is never leaving the receipt-less system, then perhaps it might. "Your mail was delivered to Blackholes 'R Us, which does not support return receipts." However, if there is a significant chance that the mail will emerge from the other end (via a .forward kind of mechanism or something), then I would think not. Given my 'druthers, I'd leave this behavior unspecified. -- Steve Dorner, Qualcomm, Inc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<sdorner-291292070904@dorner.slip.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!sdd.hp.com!network.ucsd.edu!qualcom.qualcomm.com!dorner.slip.uiuc.edu!userReferences:
<19921225.001@erik.naggum.no> <sdorner-271292095054@0.0.0.0> <Bzzt68.G8z@boulder.parcplace.com> <1992Dec29.075730.21796@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!sdd.hp.com!network.ucsd.edu!qualcom.qualcomm.com!dorner.slip.uiuc.edu!user From: sdorner@qualcomm.com (Steve Dorner) Subject: Re: Return-Receipt-To & Mailing lists Message-ID: <sdorner-291292070904@dorner.slip.uiuc.edu> Followup-To: comp.mail.headers,comp.mail.misc Sender: news@qualcomm.com Nntp-Posting-Host: dorner.slip.uiuc.edu Organization: Qualcomm, Inc. References: <19921225.001@erik.naggum.no> <sdorner-271292095054@0.0.0.0> <Bzzt68.G8z@boulder.parcplace.com> <1992Dec29.075730.21796@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 13:13:49 GMT Lines: 19