🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: How does Blank Line Get inserted between my headers (Sun Mailx)
By: Tim Goodwin on Wed, 17 May 2000 00:00

Re: How does Blank Line Get inserted between my headers (Sun Mailx)
By: Vasos Panagiotopoulos +1-917-287... on Wed, 17 May 2000 00:00

Re: How can I send BCC with Sendmail?
By: Mike Uhl on Sat, 30 Jan 1999 00:00

How can I send BCC with Sendmail?
By: Helmi on Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:00

Bouncing mail
By: John Gardiner Myers on Thu, 16 Jul 1992 20:24

C.H.E.A.P...C.I.G.A.R.E.T.T.E.S....
By: 0098 on Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:20

Re: Replacing colons with periods in To-addresses
By: Dan Heller on Tue, 13 Mar 1990 08:34

Re: Replacing colons with periods in To-addresses
By: Amanda Walker on Tue, 13 Mar 1990 02:21

Re: Replacing colons with periods in To-addresses
By: Michael Richardson on Sun, 11 Mar 1990 19:18

Re: "X.400" articles with >To:, Message-Version:, etc
By: Craig_Everhart on Tue, 06 Mar 1990 14:49

Re: "X.400" articles with >To:, Message-Version:, etc
By: John Gilmore on Mon, 05 Mar 1990 23:42

Re: Mild flame about (some) UNIX mailers
By: Peter da Silva on Fri, 02 Mar 1990 20:04

Re: Mild flame about (some) UNIX mailers
By: Jef Poskanzer on Fri, 02 Mar 1990 18:06

Re: How to set a "Reply-To: " filed in the mail header?
By: Jerry Peek on Fri, 02 Mar 1990 11:18

Re: Mild flame about (some) UNIX mailers
By: Ned Freed on Mon, 26 Feb 1990 11:39

Re: Mild flame about (some) UNIX mailers
By: Eliot on Sun, 25 Feb 1990 23:27

Re: Mild flame about (some) UNIX mailers
By: jeh on Sun, 25 Feb 1990 04:31

Mild flame about (some) UNIX mailers
By: Matt Madison on Sat, 24 Feb 1990 20:50

Re: How to set a "Reply-To: " filed in the mail header?
By: Jan Stevens on Wed, 21 Feb 1990 12:54

Re: How to set a "Reply-To: " filed in the mail header?
By: Barton E. Schaefer on Tue, 20 Feb 1990 16:51

Re: How to set a "Reply-To: " filed in the mail header?
By: Dan Heller on Tue, 20 Feb 1990 07:00

Re: How to set a "Reply-To: " filed in the mail header?
By: Robert Stephens on Tue, 20 Feb 1990 03:21

message encapsulation in returned mail: a plea
By: Kyle Jones on Mon, 12 Feb 1990 20:18

How to set a "Reply-To: " filed in the mail header?
By: Rouben Rostamian on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 20:23

test
By: h235_062 on Tue, 09 Jan 1990 17:26

MCIMAIL CMSLINK
By: 1770 MCI on Tue, 02 Jan 1990 18:05

RFC-822 'phrase' question
By: Mark Harris on Sun, 11 Jun 1989 03:01

Re: Time-zone abbreviations in international mail
By: Joe Buck on Sat, 10 Jun 1989 21:43

worst header mangling I've seen
By: der Mouse on Fri, 09 Jun 1989 05:14

Time-zone abbreviations in international mail
By: Scott Horne on Thu, 08 Jun 1989 19:15

RFC822 And New BBS compatibility with UUCP
By: Chris Bradley on Wed, 07 Jun 1989 06:06

Re: x.400
By: Mark A. Verber on Fri, 21 Apr 1989 13:36

Re: x.400
By: Alyson L. Abramowitz on Thu, 20 Apr 1989 22:17

Re: Is comp.mail.headers dead?
By: Edward C Horvath on Mon, 27 Mar 1989 21:42

Re: Is comp.mail.headers dead?
By: Bill Wisner on Mon, 27 Mar 1989 18:07

Re: Is comp.mail.headers dead?
By: Rasmus Lerdorf on Sun, 26 Mar 1989 13:56

Is comp.mail.headers dead?
By: Jef Poskanzer on Fri, 24 Mar 1989 12:35

Re: simple encryption in mail (no more legal discussion)
By: Svante Lindahl on Wed, 08 Feb 1989 22:13

Re: administration fascism
By: Richard Childers on Tue, 07 Feb 1989 03:22

Re: administration fascism
By: Craig Leres on Wed, 08 Feb 1989 04:07

Re: administration fascism
By: Karl Kleinpaste on Tue, 07 Feb 1989 13:41

Re: simple encryption in mail (no more legal discussion)
By: Robert Claeson on Sat, 04 Feb 1989 18:25

Re: administration fascism
By: Michael I. Bushnell on Sat, 04 Feb 1989 21:53

Re: administration fascism
By: Casper H.S. Dik on Thu, 02 Feb 1989 21:05

Re: administration fascism
By: Michael I. Bushnell on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 23:22

Re: administration fascism
By: Guy Harris on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 18:52

Re: administration fascism
By: Karl Lehenbauer on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 13:12

Re: administration fascism
By: Craig Leres on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 05:01

Re: administration fascism
By: Michael I. Bushnell on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 03:56

administration fascism
By: Richard Childers on Sat, 28 Jan 1989 07:39

Re: simple encryption in mail (no more legal discussion)
By: Tony Li on Sun, 29 Jan 1989 07:37

Re: simple encryption in mail (no more legal discussion)
By: Andreas Krueger on Sat, 28 Jan 1989 03:38

Re: simple encryption in mail (no more legal discussion)
By: Steve Dempsey on Fri, 27 Jan 1989 03:44

Re: simple encryption in mail
By: Steve Schonberger on Tue, 24 Jan 1989 20:14

Re: simple encryption in mail
By: MICHAEL on Mon, 23 Jan 1989 14:05

Re: Still trying to get smart routing working.
By: Guy Harris on Thu, 19 Jan 1989 18:57

Re: Still trying to get smart routing working.
By: Roy Smith on Thu, 19 Jan 1989 16:32

Re: Still trying to get smart routing working.
By: Craig Leres on Thu, 19 Jan 1989 06:52

Re: Still trying to get smart routing working.
By: Richard Childers on Wed, 18 Jan 1989 23:36

ucbarpa's sendmail config (was sendmail incompatibility )
By: Dan Heller on Tue, 10 Jan 1989 08:22

sendmail incompatibility (was Re: Still trying to get ...).
By: Keith Moore on Mon, 09 Jan 1989 07:00

Re: Still trying to get smart routing working.
By: Paul A Vixie on Sun, 08 Jan 1989 23:31

Re: Still trying to get smart routing working.
By: Paul A Vixie on Sun, 08 Jan 1989 23:36

Re: Still trying to get smart routing working.
By: Bill Wisner on Sun, 08 Jan 1989 10:50

Still trying to get smart routing working.
By: Dewey Henize on Sat, 07 Jan 1989 20:33

Simple form of RFC 822?
By: Mark Sirota on Tue, 27 Dec 1988 20:30

Re: Is dot valid in address for indicating absolute domain name?
By: Craig F. Everhart on Thu, 15 Dec 1988 16:51

Is dot valid in address for indicating absolute domain name?
By: Brad Allen on Wed, 14 Dec 1988 11:27

Re: "Errors-To:" header (was Re: Mail header wishlist)
By: Karl Kleinpaste on Mon, 12 Dec 1988 16:17

"Errors-To:" header (was Re: Mail header wishlist)
By: Keith Reynolds on Thu, 08 Dec 1988 22:20

Re: Mail header wishlist (was Re: Another example why not to re-route)
By: Peter Marvit on Wed, 07 Dec 1988 02:02

Validity check failed - What is it ?
By: Roland Dirlewanger on Mon, 05 Dec 1988 10:28

Re: Mail header wishlist
By: Michael I. Bushnell on Wed, 07 Dec 1988 04:16

Re: Mail header wishlist
By: Bob Page on Tue, 06 Dec 1988 22:00

Re: Mail header wishlist
By: David Herron -- One of the verte... on Sat, 03 Dec 1988 16:51

Re: Mail header wishlist
By: Kyle Jones on Fri, 02 Dec 1988 14:27

Re: Mail header wishlist
By: Karl Kleinpaste on Thu, 01 Dec 1988 15:04

Mail header wishlist (was Re: Another example why not to re-route)
By: Tim Ramsey on Thu, 01 Dec 1988 09:24

Widespread violation of RCF822 in "received" ?
By: Michael Newbery on Thu, 03 Nov 1988 23:41

Re: I would like to see a header Sender-Addressed-To: <orig. To-address>
By: Brian Kantor on Wed, 26 Oct 1988 22:40

Re: To parse the unparseable dream
By: Craig F. Everhart on Wed, 26 Oct 1988 16:11

I would like to see a header Sender-Addressed-To: <orig. To-address>
By: Werner Uhrig on Tue, 25 Oct 1988 17:54

Re: To parse the unparseable dream
By: Chet Ramey on Tue, 25 Oct 1988 18:31

Re: To parse the unparseable dream
By: David Herron -- One of the verte... on Wed, 26 Oct 1988 04:18

To parse the unparseable dream
By: Roy Smith on Tue, 25 Oct 1988 12:19

Is anyone using the RFC822 address grammar from comp.sources.misc?
By: John Mackin on Mon, 24 Oct 1988 16:23

Re: pathalias
By: Mike Waters on Fri, 21 Oct 1988 15:35

pathalias
By: Tim Snider on Wed, 12 Oct 1988 21:28

Contents of RFC822 field "Encrypted"
By: Jos Vos on Thu, 06 Oct 1988 07:00

Re: "Return-Receipt-To:" and Mail/mailx
By: Andy Behrens on Wed, 28 Sep 1988 17:29

Re: "Return-Receipt-To:" and Mail/mailx
By: Dan Ehrlich on Tue, 27 Sep 1988 00:49

Re: "Return-Receipt-To:" and Mail/mailx
By: Fuat C. Baran on Tue, 27 Sep 1988 02:12

Re: "Return-Receipt-To:" and Mail/mailx
By: Eric Gisin on Tue, 27 Sep 1988 14:17

Re: "Return-Receipt-To:" and Mail/mailx
By: Karl Kleinpaste on Mon, 26 Sep 1988 17:22

Re: "Return-Receipt-To:" and Mail/mailx
By: Dan Ehrlich on Mon, 26 Sep 1988 13:55

"Return-Receipt-To:" and Mail/mailx
By: Roger B.A. Klorese on Fri, 23 Sep 1988 14:51

Sun definitely doesn't know how to rewrite From: lines
By: Bill Wisner on Tue, 09 Aug 1988 18:35

Re: Real data to support my claim that '-d sun' is the way to go.
By: Bill Kennedy on Mon, 08 Aug 1988 12:14

Re: "X-" blithering (really X-Mailer)
By: Norman S. Soley on Mon, 08 Aug 1988 05:14

Re: "X-" blithering
By: John Diamant on Fri, 05 Aug 1988 04:14

Re: "X-" blithering
By: David Messer on Thu, 04 Aug 1988 17:08

Re: "X-" blithering
By: Stewart I. Alpert on Wed, 03 Aug 1988 20:34

Re: "X-" blithering
By: John Owens on Wed, 03 Aug 1988 18:15

Re: "X-" blithering
By: Matt Landau on Wed, 03 Aug 1988 19:00

Re: "X-" blithering
By: John B. Nagle on Wed, 03 Aug 1988 17:19

Re: "X-" blithering
By: Ka Kahula on Wed, 03 Aug 1988 16:19

Re: "X-" blithering
By: Ron Natalie on Wed, 03 Aug 1988 14:51

Re: "X-" blithering
By: George michaelson on Tue, 02 Aug 1988 23:57

Re: "X-" blithering
By: Darren Griffiths on Wed, 03 Aug 1988 10:18

Re: "X-" blithering
By: Jean-Francois Lamy on Wed, 03 Aug 1988 15:06

"X-" blithering
By: John B. Nagle on Tue, 02 Aug 1988 16:49

Re: mixed addresses
By: Mike Scott on Tue, 26 Jul 1988 08:12

Re: mixed addresses
By: David Herron -- One of the verte... on Wed, 20 Jul 1988 19:34

Who is munging mailbox names with the site name?
By: Michael on Mon, 18 Jul 1988 18:30

Re: mixed addresses
By: Rich Salz on Tue, 19 Jul 1988 13:09

Re: Forwarded mail headers
By: Mark Robert Smith on Tue, 10 May 1988 17:32

Incorrect news headers
By: Jon Zeeff on Thu, 12 May 1988 13:48

Forwarded mail headers
By: S.OHIO-STATE.EDU%brl-adm.arpa%br... on Mon, 09 May 1988 03:25

[postmaster@utadnx.cc.utexas.edu: Mail Delivery Problem]
By: admadmadmjsolbu-it.bu.edubrl-adm... on Mon, 09 May 1988 02:06

Forwarded mail headers
By: IO-STATE.EDU%brl-adm.arpa%brl-ad... on Mon, 09 May 1988 00:48

Re: Forwarded mail headers
By: Dik T. Winter on Mon, 09 May 1988 00:28

[postmaster@utadnx.cc.utexas.edu: Mail Delivery Problem]
By: adm!adm!jsol%bu-it.bu.edu%brl-ad... on Sun, 08 May 1988 23:41

Forwarded mail headers
By: TATE.EDU%brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.ar... on Sun, 08 May 1988 21:55

[postmaster@utadnx.cc.utexas.edu: Mail Delivery Problem]
By: adm!jsol%bu-it.bu.edu on Sun, 08 May 1988 20:36

Forwarded mail headers
By: .EDUbrl-adm.arpabrl-adm.arpabrl-... on Sun, 08 May 1988 20:03

\\\\\\\\"forwarded mail format\\\\\\\\"
By: brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.arpa%brl-ad... on Sun, 08 May 1988 18:55

[postmaster@utadnx.cc.utexas.edu: Mail Delivery Problem]
By: jsol on Sun, 08 May 1988 17:47

\\\\\\\"forwarded mail format\\\\\\\"
By: adm.arpa%brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.ar... on Sun, 08 May 1988 16:52