Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #695Re: "X.400" articles with >To:, Message-Version:, etc
From: Craig_Everhart
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1990 14:49
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1990 14:49
11 lines
850 bytes
850 bytes
I don't think there's anything out-and-out illegal about what you quoted in the gatewayed-from-X.400 header. You may not *like* the >To: and >From: headers, but RFC822 says they're OK. (Whether B-news likes them is another matter, but that's a ``small matter of programming.'') The two additional IDs will doubtless be useful to you three years hence when you're debugging your own installation of X.400. Craig
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gZwwrR70BwwOQMSnQv@transarc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!TRANSARC.COM!Craig_EverhartReferences:
<10613@hoptoad.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!TRANSARC.COM!Craig_Everhart From: Craig_Everhart@TRANSARC.COM Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers Subject: Re: "X.400" articles with >To:, Message-Version:, etc Message-ID: <gZwwrR70BwwOQMSnQv@transarc.com> Date: 6 Mar 90 14:49:01 GMT References: <10613@hoptoad.uucp> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Lines: 11