🚀 go-pugleaf

Forwarded mail headers
By: TATE.EDU%brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.ar... on Sun, 08 May 1988 21:55

[postmaster@utadnx.cc.utexas.edu: Mail Delivery Problem]
By: adm!jsol%bu-it.bu.edu on Sun, 08 May 1988 20:36

Forwarded mail headers
By: .EDUbrl-adm.arpabrl-adm.arpabrl-... on Sun, 08 May 1988 20:03

\\\\\\\\"forwarded mail format\\\\\\\\"
By: brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.arpa%brl-ad... on Sun, 08 May 1988 18:55

[postmaster@utadnx.cc.utexas.edu: Mail Delivery Problem]
By: jsol on Sun, 08 May 1988 17:47

\\\\\\\"forwarded mail format\\\\\\\"
By: adm.arpa%brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.ar... on Sun, 08 May 1988 16:52

Forwarded mail headers
By: %brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.arpa%brl-a... on Sun, 08 May 1988 16:17

Forwarded mail headers
By: -adm.arpa%brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.a... on Sun, 08 May 1988 14:47

\\\\\\"forwarded mail format\\\\\\"
By: arpa%brl-adm.arpa on Sun, 08 May 1988 14:03

Forwarded mail headers
By: .arpabrl-adm.arpabrl-adm.arpabrl... on Sun, 08 May 1988 13:29

\\\\\"forwarded mail format\\\\\"
By: Anon on Sun, 08 May 1988 12:21

Forwarded mail headers
By: a%brl-adm.arpa%brl-adm.arpa%brl-... on Sun, 08 May 1988 11:36

\\\\"forwarded mail format\\\\"
By: admadmadmjsolbu-it.bu.edubrl-adm... on Sun, 08 May 1988 10:46

Forwarded mail headers
By: l-adm.arpa%brl-adm.arpa on Sun, 08 May 1988 09:37

\\\"forwarded mail format\\\"
By: adm!adm!jsol%bu-it.bu.edu%brl-ad... on Sun, 08 May 1988 08:53

Forwarded mail headers
By: m.arpa on Sun, 08 May 1988 07:43

\\"forwarded mail format\\"
By: adm!jsol%bu-it.bu.edu on Sun, 08 May 1988 06:45

\"forwarded mail format\"
By: jsol on Sun, 08 May 1988 05:04

Forwarded mail headers
By: pa on Sun, 08 May 1988 05:04

Forwarded mail headers
By: arpa on Sun, 08 May 1988 01:40

Forwarded mail headers
By: Larry W. Virden on Sat, 07 May 1988 23:04

Forwarded mail headers
By: Larry W. Virden on Sat, 07 May 1988 13:19

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Chip Salzenberg on Thu, 14 Apr 1988 14:13

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Rob Warnock on Fri, 15 Apr 1988 04:59

Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers?
By: Craig F. Everhart on Thu, 14 Apr 1988 15:08

Humongous pathalias database
By: Matt Costello on Wed, 13 Apr 1988 04:08

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Jay Maynard on Mon, 11 Apr 1988 23:22

Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers?
By: Per Hedeland on Mon, 11 Apr 1988 10:21

Re: routes vs addresses (was Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?)
By: Rich Salz on Fri, 08 Apr 1988 22:59

Re: routes vs addresses (was Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?)
By: Joe Buck on Fri, 08 Apr 1988 18:19

Re: ! and @
By: Lennart_Lovstrand.EuroPARC on Fri, 08 Apr 1988 11:05

Re: Ambiguous addresses (was: ! and @)
By: John Diamant on Thu, 07 Apr 1988 02:46

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: John Diamant on Sun, 03 Apr 1988 09:29

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Joe Buck on Thu, 07 Apr 1988 21:28

Re: routes vs addresses (was Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?)
By: Rich Salz on Thu, 07 Apr 1988 13:59

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Leslie Mikesell on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 20:51

Ambiguous addresses (was: ! and @)
By: Mark Sirota on Thu, 07 Apr 1988 00:08

routes vs addresses (was Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?)
By: Bill Wisner on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 23:39

Re: ! and @
By: John Sloan on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 11:00

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Rahul Dhesi on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 14:37

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Tim Thompson on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 02:55

Re: ! and @
By: Jeff Siegal on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 03:46

! and @
By: Peter Karp on Tue, 05 Apr 1988 19:16

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Joe Buck on Tue, 05 Apr 1988 16:41

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Leslie Mikesell on Tue, 05 Apr 1988 02:39

Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Postmaster & BITINFO on Tue, 05 Apr 1988 01:03

re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Rick Adams on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 17:58

Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers?
By: Craig F. Everhart on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 15:10

re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Craig Partridge on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 14:00

remove from mailing list
By: Walt Livingston on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 12:23

! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Rob Austein on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 07:36

mailing list
By: #YEUN14%UOFMCC.BITNET on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 04:03

! and @ -- which RFC ?
By: Walter Roberson on Sat, 02 Apr 1988 15:25

Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers?
By: Ron Natalie on Fri, 01 Apr 1988 22:35

Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in
By: Patrick Barron on Fri, 01 Apr 1988 17:10

Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers?
By: Tim Pozar on Thu, 31 Mar 1988 16:49

Re: Looking for C code to parse RFC822 headers
By: Chuck Cranor on Tue, 29 Mar 1988 15:56

Re: Looking for C code to parse RFC822 headers
By: Peter Marvit on Mon, 28 Mar 1988 22:43

Good thing SUN knows what it is doing with Sendmail!
By: Dan Ehrlich on Mon, 21 Mar 1988 21:48

Looking for C code to parse RFC822 headers
By: Mike (My watch has windows) Meye... on Fri, 18 Mar 1988 08:25

Re: Timezones
By: Ed Wright on Wed, 16 Mar 1988 05:54

Re: Re: Timezones
By: Lee Mellinger on Thu, 03 Mar 1988 20:37

Strange Address: MAE%IME>USP%USP%USP;SPO:*EMBRA>FLOW/BR.SSANET&CI ...
By: Postmaster & BITINFO on Wed, 02 Mar 1988 05:34

Re: Re: Timezones
By: Doug Gwyn on Tue, 01 Mar 1988 22:06

Re: Timezones
By: Kannan Varadhan on Tue, 01 Mar 1988 18:50

Re: Re: Timezones
By: Keld J|rn Simonsen on Mon, 29 Feb 1988 13:31

Re: Timezones
By: Hans Rancke-Madsen. on Mon, 29 Feb 1988 12:24

Timezones
By: Bill on Wed, 24 Feb 1988 05:14

Mailing list request
By: George Rabinowitz on Sat, 20 Feb 1988 00:00

Re: Braden on secondary IP addresses
By: Paul Mockapetris on Fri, 19 Feb 1988 04:09

Mailing list removal
By: Walt Livingston on Sat, 20 Feb 1988 22:43

Re: Errors-To
By: David Alpern on Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:48

Braden on secondary IP addresses
By: Mark Crispin on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 23:32

Re: trying multiple addresses
By: Jordan Hayes on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 22:11

Re: trying multiple addresses
By: Clive Dawson on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 14:31

Re: trying multiple addresses
By: Mark Crispin on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 08:08

Re: A plea for sanity (Errors-to:)
By: John Chambers on Mon, 15 Feb 1988 16:44

trying multiple addresses
By: Mark Crispin on Mon, 15 Feb 1988 03:33

some mailers exhibit the following behavior
By: Rob Austein on Sun, 14 Feb 1988 21:20

Re: A plea for sanity (Errors-to:)
By: Bob Larson on Sun, 14 Feb 1988 21:02

Re: A plea for sanity
By: G. Roderick Singleton on Thu, 18 Feb 1988 01:21

Re: trying multiple addresses
By: Charles Hedrick on Wed, 17 Feb 1988 04:45

Re: Trying multiple addresses
By: Mark Crispin on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 20:25

Re: trying multiple addresses
By: braden on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 19:36

Trying multiple addresses
By: Craig Partridge on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 17:19

Correction on MILNET packet charges
By: Frank J. Wancho on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 01:07

Re: trying multiple addresses
By: Clive Dawson on Tue, 16 Feb 1988 00:09

Re: some mailers exhibit the following behavior
By: Ron Natalie on Mon, 15 Feb 1988 15:53

Re: trying multiple addresses
By: Ron Natalie on Mon, 15 Feb 1988 16:04

Re: trying multiple addresses
By: Ron Natalie on Mon, 15 Feb 1988 16:02

Re: A plea for sanity
By: Mark Crispin on Sun, 14 Feb 1988 08:32

Re: A plea for sanity
By: Stuart Levy on Sun, 14 Feb 1988 08:28

trying multiple addresses
By: Frank J. Wancho on Mon, 15 Feb 1988 04:38

Xerox experience with broken mailer behaviour
By: JLarson.pa on Mon, 15 Feb 1988 00:50

Re: some mailers exhibit the following behavior
By: Mark Crispin on Sun, 14 Feb 1988 09:55

some mailers exhibit the following behavior
By: Jordan Hayes on Sun, 14 Feb 1988 09:51

re: A plea for sanity (Errors-to:)
By: Tovar on Sun, 14 Feb 1988 08:33

A plea for sanity
By: Rob Austein on Fri, 12 Feb 1988 19:02

Re: Idea for changes to sendmail rewriting rules (LONG)
By: Jeff Stearns on Tue, 09 Feb 1988 20:46

revising RFC822: heresy or possibility?
By: Rob Austein on Sun, 07 Feb 1988 19:16

Error messages
By: Peter Karp on Sun, 07 Feb 1988 19:16

Receiving too much mail
By: Jacob Palme QZ on Sun, 07 Feb 1988 19:13

revising RFC822: heresy or possibility?
By: Frank J. Wancho on Sun, 07 Feb 1988 18:52

revising RFC822: heresy or possibility?
By: June Genis on Sun, 07 Feb 1988 18:41

Idea for changes to sendmail rewriting rules
By: Edward Wilkinson on Fri, 29 Jan 1988 17:06

Interpretation of local time offset (<zone>) in RFC822
By: Martin Lottermoser on Wed, 20 Jan 1988 17:46

Correction to my mail of 13 Jan 88 15:45 CET
By: Martin Lottermoser on Wed, 20 Jan 1988 16:59

Strange `From ' lines
By: Jamie Hanrahan on Sun, 27 Dec 1987 22:22

Re: Mail guesses [fixed]
By: Barry Margolin on Fri, 18 Dec 1987 23:27

Mail guesses [fixed]
By: Robert C. White Jr. on Thu, 17 Dec 1987 00:53

Re: RFC976 vs. the real world...
By: Karl Kleinpaste on Wed, 16 Dec 1987 14:08

Re: RFC976 vs. the real world...
By: Jim Reid on Wed, 02 Dec 1987 12:51

Re: RFC976 vs. the real world...
By: Phil Trubey on Wed, 09 Dec 1987 22:50

BITNET-Internet gateway change
By: YBMCU on Wed, 02 Dec 1987 17:05

Mail Headers Definitions for YACC
By: Robert C. White Jr. on Sat, 28 Nov 1987 01:39

RFC976 vs. the real world...
By: Ronald S. Karr on Sat, 21 Nov 1987 09:12

Re: Domain servers, mail exchangers, etc.
By: John Owens on Tue, 17 Nov 1987 00:16

Re: bad addresses from uucp
By: John Owens on Mon, 16 Nov 1987 19:48

Re: Domain servers, mail exchangers, etc.
By: Postmaster & BITINFO on Mon, 16 Nov 1987 13:29

bad addresses from uucp
By: Bob Larson on Mon, 09 Nov 1987 22:02

Re: sendmail hop count too low?
By: Craig Leres on Mon, 19 Oct 1987 21:51

Re: sendmail hop count too low?
By: Chris Johnston on Fri, 16 Oct 1987 19:20

Re: sendmail hop count too low?
By: Kyle Jones on Thu, 15 Oct 1987 01:39

well traveled message
By: Richard Johnsson on Sat, 08 Aug 1987 23:33

Problem with 'S' field.
By: isns01 on Fri, 19 Jun 1987 19:38

where does my mail come from
By: Johan Vromans on Thu, 21 May 1987 08:23

MX-existence and mail header etiquette]
By: ROODE on Sat, 16 May 1987 07:44

Re: UNIX <-> VMS Mail Transfer
By: dww on Thu, 14 May 1987 22:33