Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #560Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?
From: Chip Salzenberg
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1988 14:13
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1988 14:13
33 lines
2065 bytes
2065 bytes
[Note that this has been crossposted to comp.mail.uucp and comp.unix.xenix]
In article <472@splut.UUCP> jay@splut.UUCP (Jay Maynard) writes:
>In article <4634@chinet.UUCP> les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) writes:
>> The machines are small and fairly loaded as is; I don't want each of
>>them to have to store the names of all the machines in the known universe
>>or to search such a table every time mail is sent.
>
>This is the reason I haven't installed smail on splut yet. I don't want
>to maintain a humongous database (if my 286 machine could even handle
>it, and one neighbor indicates it can't) [...]
Well, you can run pathalias under Xenix/286 -- I do so on ateng.
But let me make one thing perfectly clear:
>> You don't need a complete paths file to run smail. <<
Smail is a very useful program even without a global paths file. Its
aliasing facility is nice (much better than SCO's in my opinion),
and it supports the ".forward" file for user-controller forwarding.
If you don't have the space or inclination to run pathalias, just make a
paths file by hand which contains the hosts you talk to often; then smail
will route those hosts and you can spell out a bang path from there.
>(Anyone with a solution to this one will earn my undying thanks!)
Okay, so what are your thanks worth? :-)
--
Chip Salzenberg "chip@ateng.UU.NET" or "codas!ateng!chip"
A T Engineering My employer may or may not agree with me.
"I must create a system or be enslaved by another man's." -- Blake
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<237@ateng.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!ge-dab!codas!ateng!chipReferences:
<1121@cblpf.ATT.COM> <4634@chinet.UUCP> <472@splut.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!ge-dab!codas!ateng!chip From: chip@ateng.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg) Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers,comp.mail.uucp,comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? Message-ID: <237@ateng.UUCP> Date: 14 Apr 88 14:13:58 GMT References: <1121@cblpf.ATT.COM> <4634@chinet.UUCP> <472@splut.UUCP> Reply-To: chip@ateng.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg) Followup-To: comp.mail.uucp,comp.unix.xenix Distribution: na Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL Lines: 33