Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers?

Article View: comp.mail.headers

Article #527

#527

From: Tim Pozar
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 1988 16:49

13 lines
1020 bytes

   As the subject says...  Can underbars be used in the name of
   the user in the address of INTERNET or UUCP addresses?
    
       eg.  Tim_Pozar@fidogate.fidonet.org

-- 
=======================================================================
| ...sun!hoptoad!\                                     Tim Pozar      |
|                 >fidogate!pozar               Fido:  1:125/406      |
|  ...lll-winken!/                            PaBell:  (415) 788-3904 |
|         USNail:  KKSF  77 Maiden Lane  San Francisco CA 94108       |
=======================================================================

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4289@hoptoad.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!hoptoad!pozar

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!hoptoad!pozar
From: pozar@hoptoad.uucp (Tim Pozar)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in 
 RFC822 headers?
Message-ID: <4289@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: 31 Mar 88 16:49:16 GMT
Reply-To: pozar@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Pozar)
Organization: Syncstream/Widget Systems (San Francisco)
Lines: 13