Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in

Article View: comp.mail.headers

Article #528

#528

From: Patrick Barron
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 1988 17:10

12 lines
1026 bytes

In article <4289@hoptoad.uucp> pozar@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Pozar) writes:
>   As the subject says...  Can underbars be used in the name of
>   the user in the address of INTERNET or UUCP addresses?
>    
>       eg.  Tim_Pozar@fidogate.fidonet.org

Interpretation of anything to the left of the "@" sign is left up to
the recieving host.  In theory, you can put anything there (even delimiter
characters, if you enclose the whole thing on the left with quotation
marks).

--Pat.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4838@aw.sei.cmu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!PT.CS.CMU.EDU!sei!sei.cmu.edu!pdb

References: <4289@hoptoad.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!PT.CS.CMU.EDU!sei!sei.cmu.edu!pdb
From: pdb@sei.cmu.edu (Patrick Barron)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in
Message-ID: <4838@aw.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 1 Apr 88 17:10:50 GMT
References: <4289@hoptoad.uucp>
Sender: netnews@sei.cmu.edu
Reply-To: pdb@sei.cmu.edu (Pat Barron)
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, SEI, Pgh, Pa
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message