Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #25Re: Return-Path or From: ?
From: Rahul Dhesi
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:39
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:39
20 lines
1348 bytes
1348 bytes
There was a period of time long ago during which I found that one or two intermediate UUCP sites were mangling From: headers quite badly. During that period of time, I found it convenient to tell MH to send replies to the return-path field. Even today, there are a few sites that will change a fully-qualified domain-form From: address into bang-path form. Other sites will happily prepend their name to this bang-path. Yet others *won't*. The final result is what looks like a complete bang-path, but it has some names missing in the middle. At that point the mail bounces with "unknown UUCP host". (And we started with a nice FQDN, which is supposed to be Immutable and Always Replyable.) The reply-path seems to be usually much better behaved. Fortunately I haven't found it necessary lately to use the reply-path for replies, but I can see why some people might. -- Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@cirrus.com> also: dhesi@rahul.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul31.173909.3072@cirrus.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!tymix!cirrus!dhesiReferences:
<1992Jul27.024211.20761@ryptyde.cts.com> <MLoqr*E11@senga.ka.sub.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!tymix!cirrus!dhesi From: dhesi@cirrus.com (Rahul Dhesi) Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers Subject: Re: Return-Path or From: ? Message-ID: <1992Jul31.173909.3072@cirrus.com> Date: 31 Jul 92 17:39:09 GMT References: <1992Jul27.024211.20761@ryptyde.cts.com> <MLoqr*E11@senga.ka.sub.org> Sender: news@cirrus.com Organization: Cirrus Logic Inc, Fremont, CA Lines: 20