🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #25

Re: Return-Path or From: ?

#25
From: Rahul Dhesi
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:39
20 lines
1348 bytes
There was a period of time long ago during which I found that one or
two intermediate UUCP sites were mangling From: headers quite badly.
During that period of time, I found it convenient to tell MH to send
replies to the return-path field.

Even today, there are a few sites that will change a fully-qualified
domain-form From: address into bang-path form.  Other sites will
happily prepend their name to this bang-path.  Yet others *won't*.  The
final result is what looks like a complete bang-path, but it has some
names missing in the middle.  At that point the mail bounces with
"unknown UUCP host".  (And we started with a nice FQDN, which is
supposed to be Immutable and Always Replyable.)

The reply-path seems to be usually much better behaved.

Fortunately I haven't found it necessary lately to use the reply-path
for replies, but I can see why some people might.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@cirrus.com>
also: dhesi@rahul.net
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Jul31.173909.3072@cirrus.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!tymix!cirrus!dhesi
References: <1992Jul27.024211.20761@ryptyde.cts.com> <MLoqr*E11@senga.ka.sub.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!tymix!cirrus!dhesi
From: dhesi@cirrus.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: Re: Return-Path or From: ?
Message-ID: <1992Jul31.173909.3072@cirrus.com>
Date: 31 Jul 92 17:39:09 GMT
References: <1992Jul27.024211.20761@ryptyde.cts.com> <MLoqr*E11@senga.ka.sub.org>
Sender: news@cirrus.com
Organization: Cirrus Logic Inc, Fremont, CA
Lines: 20