Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #269Re: Replying to Sender or (gasp) Return-path
From: Marshall Rose
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1986 21:07
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1986 21:07
7 lines
660 bytes
660 bytes
Mark: If what we are arguing here is "validation", then I appologize. I am not talking about validation. I agree with your argument that validating against lazy software is wrong. /mtr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<903@brl-adm.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!adm!mrose@nrtc-gremlin.arpaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!adm!mrose@nrtc-gremlin.arpa From: mrose@nrtc-gremlin.arpa (Marshall Rose) Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers Subject: Re: Replying to Sender or (gasp) Return-path Message-ID: <903@brl-adm.ARPA> Date: Tue, 18-Nov-86 16:07:52 EST Article-I.D.: brl-adm.903 Posted: Tue Nov 18 16:07:52 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Nov-86 21:39:11 EST Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA Lines: 7