Re: rmail-reply-to-sender

Article View: comp.mail.headers

Article #301

#301

From: David Alpern
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1986 06:47

6 lines
721 bytes

I don't believe the SENDER field should ever be used when developing
the list of addressees for a reply.  See RFC822 on this.  (Although,
I'll agree, there are times....  My own reply code will use the SENDER
field only if an explicit option is given by the replying human.)

- Dave

Technical Details

Message-ID: <881@brl-adm.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!brl-adm!adm!Alpern@ibm.com

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!brl-adm!adm!Alpern@ibm.com
From: Alpern@ibm.com (David Alpern)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: Re: rmail-reply-to-sender
Message-ID: <881@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 18-Nov-86 01:47:49 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-adm.881
Posted: Tue Nov 18 01:47:49 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Nov-86 08:13:35 EST
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 6