Re: I hate smail

Article View: comp.mail.headers

Article #332

#332

From: Patrick Barron
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1987 19:52

15 lines
1127 bytes

In article <649@crash.UUCP> bblue@crash.UUCP (Bill Blue) writes:
>
>	fred@site.dec.com@decwrl
>
>Will also work nicely.  Anytime you need to sneak syntax by smail
>that would normally be altered, use the above example.
>
>--Bill

Remember, though, if you're trying to get mail out over the Internet, the
above address is illegal according to RFC822, which explicitly specifies
that only ONE '@' sign be present in the address.

--Pat.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <517@aw.sei.cmu.edu.sei.cmu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei.cmu.edu!pdb

References: <14227@amdcad.UUCP> <32@auspyr.UUCP> <14237@amdcad.UUCP> <4071@nsc.NSC.COM> <649@crash.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei.cmu.edu!pdb
From: pdb@sei.cmu.edu (Patrick Barron)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: Re: I hate smail
Message-ID: <517@aw.sei.cmu.edu.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: Sat, 10-Jan-87 14:52:44 EST
Article-I.D.: aw.517
Posted: Sat Jan 10 14:52:44 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Jan-87 23:01:08 EST
References: <14227@amdcad.UUCP> <32@auspyr.UUCP> <14237@amdcad.UUCP> <4071@nsc.NSC.COM> <649@crash.UUCP>
Sender: netnews@sei.cmu.edu
Reply-To: pdb@sei.cmu.edu (Pat Barron)
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, SEI, Pgh, Pa
Lines: 15
Summary: Not RFC822 compliant

Reply to Parent Message