Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #49Re: MH verses the "all in one file" MUAs
From: Dan Heller
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 1989 03:38
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 1989 03:38
17 lines
1089 bytes
1089 bytes
I meant to proofread this, but apparently, I missed something... > If you think that > MH's "features" are a result of the fact that it's folder storage method > is attributed to the fact that it stored messages on a file-per-message > format, you are mistaken. I meant to say : If you think that MH's great features is attributable to its method for folder storage, you are mistaken. My intent was to point out the fact that a good UA should do the "right thing" regardless of how that UA stores its messages. Two "correct" UAs --each which stores files using the Mail and the MH method-- should do the same thing when it comes to replies, etc... dan <island!argv@cad.berkeley.edu>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<113463@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!sun-barr!newstop!sun!eureka!argvShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!sun-barr!newstop!sun!eureka!argv From: argv%eureka@Sun.COM (Dan Heller) Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers Subject: Re: MH verses the "all in one file" MUAs Summary: clarification on typos... Message-ID: <113463@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: 1 Jul 89 03:38:39 GMT Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM Distribution: na Lines: 17