Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #62Re: MH verses the "all in one file" MUAs
From: Nicholas J. Simicich
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1989 14:20
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1989 14:20
17 lines
1170 bytes
1170 bytes
In article <18916@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU> ut6y@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (The Dread Pirate Mikey (Mike Shappe)) writes: >The final advantage is simply that it is compatible with normal Berkley Mail. >This may not seem important until you realize that there are times when one >has to, for whatever reason, resort to old Mail/Mailx. I think that I can say that this isn't true in my case. And I know many other people who do all of their mailing on Unix (AIX) who use mh-mode in GNUemacs, rmail mode in GNUemacs, or XMH, and who never use the Berkley mail command. Me? I like RMAIL mode.... -- Nick Simicich --- uunet!bywater!scifi!njs --- njs@ibm.com (Internet)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<682@scifi.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bywater!scifi!njsReferences:
<113461@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <1518@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> <18916@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bywater!scifi!njs From: njs@scifi.UUCP (Nicholas J. Simicich) Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers Subject: Re: MH verses the "all in one file" MUAs Message-ID: <682@scifi.UUCP> Date: 9 Jul 89 14:20:31 GMT References: <113461@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <1518@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> <18916@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU> Reply-To: njs@scifi.UUCP (Nicholas J. Simicich) Distribution: na Organization: Nick Simicich, Peekskill, NY Lines: 17