Article View: comp.org.decus
Article #532Re: EXECUTION of DECUS Standards
From: arthur
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 08:37
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 08:37
47 lines
3067 bytes
3067 bytes
In article <1992Dec15.143628.4673@spcvxb.spc.edu>, killeen@spcvxb.spc.edu (Jeff Killeen) writes: stuff deleted > > Terry most of upper level DECUS leadership has become very interested in input > from the customer. In fact we have some very solid organized research efforts > going on right now. However if we are going to be honest most of the postings > on this subject have been from DECUS Leaders/insiders trying to incite a riot > to reverse a decision they did not agree with. Very little has been heard > from the membership/customer. Prior to yours - the one membership type > posting was so vitriolic, so full of obscenities, and so much a general knee > jerk attack that did not relate to the issue at hand IMHO I am surprised > anyone responded to it. As one who responded earlier on this meeting, I take offense. I do not consider myself an insider (yes I helped activate the RTP LUG many, many years ago, but have not been in any kind of "leadership" role in about ten years), and my response contained no obscenities, and was not knee jerk. It did represent considerable frustration with the situation and the process. Much of my frustration is centered around the fact that DECUS grew in a way very much similar to how DEC did. It went from being very much a grass roots effort with local and/or technical focus to something more centralized, less responsive, and more bureaucratic. That may partly just reflect how the industry and DEC changed during the corresponding period. Now the industry is changing rapidly, often becoming more like it used to be. DECUS is faced with that same mandate. While I consider myself an active member of DECUS, I don't attend every symposium like I did for a while, now only one every couple of years. I also partcipate in the Unisys and HP user groups and that gives me a little different perspective. My organization does attend the national symposia more regularly than I do. Maybe the thing most disturbing about this entire discussion is how obvious it is how great the chasm is between DECUS leadership and the general membership. Nearly every posting by someone from the leadership side reinforces that view. [more stuff deleted] > -- > Jeff Killeen - DECUS U.S. Chapter NLC Chair | Email:killeen@eisner.decus.org > > DECUS is for folks who are responsible for delivering computing technology. > The NLC is the national council for DECUS's Local User Groups - come join us! Arthur Coston Applied Information Systems arthur@ais.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec16.083736.5901@ais.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!sdd.hp.com!caen!uvaarpa!concert!ais.com!arthurReferences:
<1992Dec2.143046.1@mscf.med.upenn.edu> <lhupaoINN978@lisboa.cs.utexas.edu> <1992Dec14.151045@mccall.com> <1992Dec15.143628.4673@spcvxb.spc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!sdd.hp.com!caen!uvaarpa!concert!ais.com!arthur From: arthur@ais.com Newsgroups: comp.org.decus Subject: Re: EXECUTION of DECUS Standards Message-ID: <1992Dec16.083736.5901@ais.com> Date: 16 Dec 92 08:37:36 GMT References: <1992Dec2.143046.1@mscf.med.upenn.edu> <lhupaoINN978@lisboa.cs.utexas.edu> <1992Dec14.151045@mccall.com> <1992Dec15.143628.4673@spcvxb.spc.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: Applied Information Systems, Chapel Hill, NC Lines: 47