🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec18.150244.4707@spcvxb.spc.edu>, killeen@spcvxb.spc.edu
(Jeff Killeen) writes, for 248 full lines, ...

Jeff, if your goal is to squash discussion through sheer number of words, I 
think that you're very close to success.

On the other hand, if you want to convince your audience, you're going to
have to do a lot better than this.  10 screens is not debate; it's ranting. 
Go back, think over your argument, and express it simply and succinctly. 
While you're at it, take some time to spell and grammar/punctuation check
your article.  This tome/missive is both too long and too incoherent for a
rational reply.  There's nothing we're talking about here which requires
30 blocks of refutation.  

Consider this exercise: the New York times has given you 500 words to
make your case.  How would you state it?

jms

Joel Snyder - DECUS Standards and Newsletter dude | Email: jms@Arizona.EDU
DECUS is for people who are overweight or are underweight. Come join us!