🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.org.decus
Article #571

Should have we kept quiet?

#571
From: Jeff Killeen Exec Committee
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 13:12
16 lines
1347 bytes
FYI...

	The DECUS President at the Monday Board Meeting at Symposia made
a statement about all the Net traffic about the By-Law change.  The
statement he made was "The Board has made its decision regarding the
By-Laws and moved onto other things.  There are those in leadership who
continue to politicize this issue by posting to the networks.  They to
should stop this and move onto other things."  This was part of the 5
minute lecture the President gave about this issue.  The thrust of it
was once the Board had made the decision all the other volunteers should
have stop discussing the issue or in my words stopped trying to inform
the electrorate.  How do you feel about this?  Do you also feel it was
inappropriate for those opposed to the Board's action to make their
opinions known during the voting process?  You can also make your
comments known to the President by sending him a message at
BRINDLEY@DECUS.ORG. 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <543BDEEA600024C9@eisner.decus.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EISNER.DECUS.ORG!KILLEEN

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EISNER.DECUS.ORG!KILLEEN
From: KILLEEN@EISNER.DECUS.ORG (Jeff Killeen Exec Committee)
Newsgroups: comp.org.decus
Subject: Should have we kept quiet?
Message-ID: <543BDEEA600024C9@eisner.decus.org>
Date: 14 May 91 13:12:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 16