Article View: comp.org.decus
Article #571Should have we kept quiet?
From: Jeff Killeen Exec Committee
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 13:12
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 13:12
16 lines
1347 bytes
1347 bytes
FYI... The DECUS President at the Monday Board Meeting at Symposia made a statement about all the Net traffic about the By-Law change. The statement he made was "The Board has made its decision regarding the By-Laws and moved onto other things. There are those in leadership who continue to politicize this issue by posting to the networks. They to should stop this and move onto other things." This was part of the 5 minute lecture the President gave about this issue. The thrust of it was once the Board had made the decision all the other volunteers should have stop discussing the issue or in my words stopped trying to inform the electrorate. How do you feel about this? Do you also feel it was inappropriate for those opposed to the Board's action to make their opinions known during the voting process? You can also make your comments known to the President by sending him a message at BRINDLEY@DECUS.ORG.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<543BDEEA600024C9@eisner.decus.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EISNER.DECUS.ORG!KILLEENShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EISNER.DECUS.ORG!KILLEEN From: KILLEEN@EISNER.DECUS.ORG (Jeff Killeen Exec Committee) Newsgroups: comp.org.decus Subject: Should have we kept quiet? Message-ID: <543BDEEA600024C9@eisner.decus.org> Date: 14 May 91 13:12:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Lines: 16