Article View: comp.org.decus
Article #572Re: Should we have kept quiet?
From: Ron Tencati
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 14:50
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 14:50
25 lines
1489 bytes
1489 bytes
Well Jeff, Bill does have a point. The votes are now in and being counted. What's done is done. I have avoided the political back-stabbing and muck because it wastes MY time. Now, if others feel they have the time to spend debating this, then good for them. I was not at the Board meeting on Monday, but if the votes are in, and the Board has closed the issue, what good is debating it anymore? If people still feel there is a change needed, I think the bylaws provide the means for another provision to be proposed. And by NOT keeping quiet about it, this newsgroup has raised the awareness of a large number of DECUS attendees and volunteers. No one will know what degree of influence this newsgroup had, but there were a lot of "No Bylaw Change" buttons at the Symposium, so I think an impact was made. I chose to stay neutral, since I really don't have the time nor interest to burn my cycles on DECUS politics. Discuss the matter, sure. But don't beat a dead horse. Ron Tencati Security & VAX SIG Steering Committees Tencati@DECUS.ORG (?)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5321@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!dftsrv!tencatiShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!dftsrv!tencati From: tencati@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (Ron Tencati) Newsgroups: comp.org.decus Subject: Re: Should we have kept quiet? Message-ID: <5321@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> Date: 14 May 91 14:50:58 GMT Sender: news@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov Reply-To: tencati@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov Lines: 25