🚀 go-pugleaf

And a post-note:

Dual celeron systems can be a cost-effective way to harness quite a bit
of CPU horsepower - these chips, while inexpensive, are of good quality
and design.  There are always limitations to any hardware setup. 
Understanding the strengths and limitations of a particular arrangement
can lead to more efficient use of the available resources - and to a
more effective system.


Totally Lost wrote:
> 
> In article <3751F4D8.8C0C9B65@dakotacom.net>,
>   CB <NocbaisanSpam@dakotacom.net> wrote:
> 
> [bulk of extensive interrogation deleted]

A wise choice as you had no specific information to provide.

> 
> > I am perfectly willing to entertain the possibility that some of your
> assertions
> > may be on the money - but you really didn't offer more than some
> general
> > theoretical arguments and cautions.  Well, I don't have a Linux server
> to run
> > through the paces, so I'm not much help either...
> >
> > CB
> 
> It seems pointless to respond.

But you did anyway ;-)

> I offered some seasoned caution, the
> concerns should be explored by anyone that is considering using a
> Celeron as a production server, or with other than small footprint
> applications. This guy appears both hostile, and doesn't even have
> a stake in the outcome.
> 
> We are continually offered advise, some must personally experience the
> pain before they are convinced of negative outcomes. The Darwin awards
> exist for a reason :)

As the cost of the equipment is low, the financial risk of
experimentation is also low.  Gigantism has been generally repudiated by
evolution.  Innovation and experimentation do not have to be confined to
those with unlimited hardware budgets.


> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.


  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----