Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #55Re: 4GB Drives: Who's better: Seagate, Quantum, or Connor
From: Gerald Brandt
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 21:36
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 21:36
18 lines
1139 bytes
1139 bytes
davis@space.mit.edu (John E. Davis) writes: >On 24 Oct 1995 02:29:45 GMT, vp24njcb@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu <vp24njcb@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu> >wrote: > : >I'm looking for good reliable 4GB SCSI drive for my PC. > : >What should I go for the Seagate Barracuda or Quantum Grand PRix? > : >The Quantums appear significantly cheaper but are they better > : >or as good as the Seagates? Better meaning more reliable. > : > : I haven't heard much good about the Barracudas. > : They tend to die unexpectedly and often, from what I hear. > : Just my opinion. Barracudas tend to run HOT! Give them lots of airflow, and they behave nicely. Gerald
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gbr.814656952@summit>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.magic.mb.ca!summit!gbrReferences:
<46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <46hj2p$r6t@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <46hk91$kmc@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.magic.mb.ca!summit!gbr From: gbr@summit.magic.mb.ca (Gerald Brandt) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: 4GB Drives: Who's better: Seagate, Quantum, or Connor Date: 25 Oct 1995 15:36:36 -0600 Organization: Rubicon BBS, Winnipeg, CANADA Message-ID: <gbr.814656952@summit> References: <46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <46hj2p$r6t@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <46hk91$kmc@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: summit.magic.mb.ca