Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?

Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware

Article #816

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware Previous Next

#816

From: Johan Kullstam
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:58

19 lines
2398 bytes

"Robert Myers" <rmyers1400@attbi.com> writes:

> It's pretty easy to get icc from support.linux.com.  You have to make small
> but manageagle changes to makefiles to get P4 optimizations.
> 
> Obviously change CC=gcc to CC=icc.  Change CFLAGS to CFLAGS
> = -tpp7 -xW -ip -ipo -vec_report3 -O3.
> 
> The vec_report3 will inform you of all the loops that haven't vectorized,
> even with Intel's own compiler.  Then you go to support.intel.com and become
> an expert on the P4's baroque architecture.

it's beyond baroque and is strongly rococo.

<URL:http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/b/baroque.html>
<URL:http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/r/rococo.html>

-- 
Johan KULLSTAM <kullstj-nn@attbi.com> sysengr

Technical Details

Message-ID: <m3u1o2hs03.fsf@sysengr.res.ray.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail

References:

<3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> <AO2P8.65367$6m5.49001@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,b32aa620bb2987b1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-17 08:24:08 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Sender: jk@sysengr.res.ray.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex,comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: P4  vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> <AO2P8.65367$6m5.49001@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
From: Johan Kullstam <kullstam@ne.mediaone.net>
Message-ID: <m3u1o2hs03.fsf@sysengr.res.ray.com>
Lines: 19
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 17 Jun 2002 10:58:04 -0400
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.125.142.46
X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com
X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1024325885 138.125.142.46 (Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:58:05 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:58:05 EDT
Organization: Raytheon Company

Reply to Parent Message