Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #817Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
From: Richard E. Hawkins
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:48
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:48
24 lines
2379 bytes
2379 bytes
In article <S1RO8.43614$UT.2974230@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, gaffo <gaffo@usenet.net> wrote: >"David Kastrup" <David.Kastrup@t-online.de> wrote in message >news:x5ofecf7vi.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz... >> Or that people buying a P4 have the attention span necessary for >> reading the given web article through to the last installment which >> says that recent versions of P4 beat the Athlons in performance, their >> design problems notwithstanding. >Only due to FSB hike and 512-cache........the core remains >ssssssssllllllllllllllooooooooooowwwww. IF the new athlons ever show the >ability to overclock to around 2.2 ghz, the p-4 will again be second >rate...................until then the p-4 is a little faster in general. >Barton will probably (maybe) change this. So maybe I shouldn't be so sad :) hawk, stuck with dual penta-thingies coming soon instead of his athlons -- Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ael0c6$udm@r02n01.cac.psu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news3.cac.psu.edu!not-for-mailReferences:
<3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <aeghpc$42k$1@reader2.wnet> <x5ofecf7vi.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> <S1RO8.43614$UT.2974230@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-17 08:51:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news3.cac.psu.edu!not-for-mail From: hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu (Richard E. Hawkins) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex Subject: Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible? Date: 17 Jun 2002 15:48:22 GMT Organization: Penn State University, Center for Academic Computing Lines: 24 Message-ID: <ael0c6$udm@r02n01.cac.psu.edu> References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <aeghpc$42k$1@reader2.wnet> <x5ofecf7vi.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> <S1RO8.43614$UT.2974230@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: fac13.ds.psu.edu X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu (Richard E. Hawkins)