Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #843Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
From: Toon Moene
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:53
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:53
17 lines
2355 bytes
2355 bytes
"G. Hugh Song" wrote: > My three-year old Compaq-alpha based 21264 duals beat P4 all the time. > Oh, my! Had compaq sold its Alpha to AMD, we would certainly have had a > much better chance of using a dual true 64-bit 21364 (EV7) by now. > For scientists like me, the way the CPU industry is turning its wheel is > something to damn about. > > Which linux distributors make their RPMs with gcc-3.1? FreeBSD (or so I heard during the Linux BoF headed by Linus T. himself). -- Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3D10EF45.703B0F1@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.56.195.71!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!bnewspeer01.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewsifeed03.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,b32aa620bb2987b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-19 13:53:25 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.56.195.71!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!bnewspeer01.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewsifeed03.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3D10EF45.703B0F1@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 22:53:25 +0200 From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex,comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible? References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.moene.indiv.nluug.nl X-Trace: 1024519984 news.nl.uu.net 224 195.109.255.217 X-Complaints-To: abuse@nl.uu.net