Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?

Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware

Article #844

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware Previous Next

#844

From: Cameron Kerr
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 03:04

26 lines
2256 bytes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

G. Hugh Song <ghsong@nospam.com> wrote:

> Which linux distributors make their RPMs with gcc-3.1?

Hopefully none, as the recommended compiler for the linux kernel is still
2.9.x. 3.x is often supplied for people compiling new software. Of course,
if you use a source distribution (Gentoo Linux???, Rock Linux???, others)
you could install the 3.x compiler, and rebuild your entire OS.

Cameron Kerr
- -- 
Email:   cameron.kerr@paradise.net.nz
Website: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~cameronk/
GPG key: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~cameronk/gpgkey.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9EUZIFw2LUu7MRP0RAtPjAJ4sSNDN3talXIDfOmkDIkIItKorKACaA+Zy
oG/kgB60L9OElUi7BlLXM/M=
=NvFn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9ogrea.6bv.ln@orloc.localdomain>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!news.xtra.co.nz!not-for-mail

References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,b32aa620bb2987b1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-19 20:20:09 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!news.xtra.co.nz!not-for-mail
From: Cameron Kerr <cameron.kerr@paradise.net.nz>
Subject: Re: P4  vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex,comp.lang.fortran
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com>
User-Agent: tin/1.5.11-20020130 ("Toxicity") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18 (i686))
Message-ID: <9ogrea.6bv.ln@orloc.localdomain>
Lines: 26
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:04:41 +1200
NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.86.53.1
X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz
X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 1024543207 210.86.53.1 (Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:20:07 NZST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:20:07 NZST
Organization: Xtra

Reply to Parent Message