🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #932

Re: Mixing PIII processors with differing cache sizes

#932
From: GrahamBanks
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 13:02
52 lines
3639 bytes
"Jeremy" <jjs@yourwindowspartition.owc.net> wrote in message
news:wcqQ9.28872$A%3.377753@ord-read.news.verio.net...
> GrahamBanks wrote:
>
> > Intel's Processor Specification Update says:
> >
> > While there are no known issues associated with the mixing of processors
> > with differing cache sizes in a dual processor
> > system, and Intel has done nothing to specifically prevent such system
> > configurations from operating, Intel does not support
> > such configurations since there may be uncharacterized errata that
exist.
> > In dual processor systems, all processors must be of
> > the same cache size.
> >
> > Is anyone aware of any issues with mixing processors with differing
cache
> > sizes? Has anyone successfully done it?
> >
> > --
> > Graham
>
>
> The cache available on each processor will be equal to the amount of the
> smaller cached proc.
>
> I think this statement was regarding Xeons...in which case you would be
> wasting alot of money for that unused cache.  With non-Xeon P3s,
> different cache sizes can mean quite different procs with diff FSB speeds.
> For example, you definately don't want to mix 100MHz FSB and 133MHz FSB
> slot1s (which are 512k and 256k cache respectively).
>
> Really you should try to get identical steppings for SMP (look for someone
> selling a matched pair) to ensure they will play nicely together.  Or at
> least check Intel's charts to ensure two different steppings are
> compatible.
>
> Jeremy
> __________________________________________________________________
> Please remove your windows partition when replying by email

Sorry, I could have been more specific in my question. I have a server with
2 Xeon PIIIs already in and there were 2 more Xeons available to buy. These
have the same stepping as the ones I already have, but a different (bigger)
cache size. I was refered to Intel's Processor Specification Update by an
earlier post, but this seemed non-comittal on the question of differing
cache sizes, so I asked the question. I've bought the two extra processors
now, and I'll be happy if they work as if they are two more of what I
already have.

Thanks for your reply.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <auuou6$g97$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!diablo.theplanet.net!news.theplanet.net!not-for-mail
References: <ausrm8$qji$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> <wcqQ9.28872$A%3.377753@ord-read.news.verio.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1113fa,7c3fc51986e3bc17
X-Google-Attributes: gid1113fa,public
X-Google-Thread: fdc9c,7c3fc51986e3bc17
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc9c,public
X-Google-Thread: 11196f,7c3fc51986e3bc17
X-Google-Attributes: gid11196f,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,7c3fc51986e3bc17
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-01 05:03:45 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!diablo.theplanet.net!news.theplanet.net!not-for-mail
From: "GrahamBanks" <gb@grahambanks.freeserve.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems,intel.microprocessors.pentium_iii,redhat.hardware.arch.intel
Subject: Re: Mixing PIII processors with differing cache sizes
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:02:32 -0000
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <auuou6$g97$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk>
References: <ausrm8$qji$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> <wcqQ9.28872$A%3.377753@ord-read.news.verio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.135.254.84
X-Trace: news5.svr.pol.co.uk 1041426182 16679 217.135.254.84 (1 Jan 2003 13:03:02 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Jan 2003 13:03:02 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@theplanet.net
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700