Thread View: comp.os.linux.hardware
56 messages
56 total messages
Page 2 of 2
Started by Chris Bitmead
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 00:00
Page 2 of 2 • 56 total messages
Re: GATEWAY 9100 LAPTOP sound support??
Author: Mark Eaton (HeTTaR)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
17 lines
1427 bytes
1427 bytes
All the gateway machines have the NeoMagic chipset I think. And that isn't supported by Xfree86 -- Mark Eaton (HeTTaR) hettar@nospam.uq.net.au # To reply please remove the nospam Chris Bitmead wrote in message <34EE4F7B.6948D582@ThePla.net>... >How well does sound work on the GATEWAY 9100 LAPTOP ? > >Does Doom sound work ok for example? > >-- >Chris Bitmead >http://www.thepla.net/~chrisb
Re: GATEWAY 9100 LAPTOP sound support??
Author: Chris Bitmead
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
26 lines
2004 bytes
2004 bytes
T > >How well does sound work on the GATEWAY 9100 LAPTOP ? > >Does Doom sound work ok for example? > > Check the HOWTO Index at > http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX-3.html . From there, > link to the Hardware Compatibility HOWTO. Then link to Laptops, and > from that page to the Linux Laptops Homepage. Finally, scroll down a > couple screens to the Gateway 2000 Solo 9100. Click. > > It even mentions sound as of 2/9/98. :) > > I trimmed followups to comp.os.linux.hardware. Yeah, yeah, I read that. What I'm after is something a bit more specific than "it sorta works". I know it says slightly more than that, but I'm trolling for more user experiences and specifics. How does doom sound, just as an example? Should I avoid the Gateway in favour of something else based on sound? These are the questions I'm wanting answers for. -- Chris Bitmead http://www.thepla.net/~chrisb
Re: GATEWAY 9100 LAPTOP sound support??
Author: Troy Davis
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
23 lines
1767 bytes
1767 bytes
On Sat, 21 Feb 1998 14:52:27 +1100, Chris Bitmead <ChrisB@ThePla.net> wrote: >How well does sound work on the GATEWAY 9100 LAPTOP ? >Does Doom sound work ok for example? Check the HOWTO Index at http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX-3.html . From there, link to the Hardware Compatibility HOWTO. Then link to Laptops, and from that page to the Linux Laptops Homepage. Finally, scroll down a couple screens to the Gateway 2000 Solo 9100. Click. It even mentions sound as of 2/9/98. :) I trimmed followups to comp.os.linux.hardware. Cheers, Troy Davis Black Cat Communications http://www.blackcat.net Seattle, WA USA
SMALLEST laptop/palmtop to buy for Linux?
Author: Wayne Throop
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
26 lines
2170 bytes
2170 bytes
I've seen the "Best LAPTOP to buy for Linux?" thread, which provokes me to ask the tangentially related question, what's the SMALLEST easily available laptop to by for Linux. I'm aware of the Libretto models, and the PC110, and others in the very-very-small-notebook or borderline-palmtop category. But appropriate models of those aren't totally satsifying to my overcritical eye, so I'm wondering about alternatives. I saw a Windoze CE palmtop advertised with possible 16Mb memory, and J.Random Accessories, but I presume a linux port to one of those would be unlikely (since many of them use exotic CPUs). So. What have people accomplished in the "small, small linux world" arena? Anybody got linux running on a sub-kilobuck palmtop (even if without X), with an IP-networking solution (ppp, ethernet, whatever) for "docking"? If not, what comes close? Especially interesting is the "IP docking" question. Any experience with PC110 or Libretto used remotely as a highly portable plug-in computing brick from an X terminal would be of interest to me. (Or is this an old and boring question, for which there is a FAQ I missed?) -- Wayne Throop throopw@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw
Re: Best LAPTOP to buy for Linux?
Author: Brett Viren
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 00:00
32 lines
2143 bytes
2143 bytes
ivy@ale.columbus.oh.us (Mike Iverson) writes: > In article <34ED4233.3507994D@ThePla.net>, Chris Bitmead wrote: > >I'm thinking of buying a laptop (fairly high end), on which I want to > >run, amoungst other things, Linux. > > > >Which brand has the best hardware support by Linux? > > While it's tough to point out a specific brand, there are a few > things to avoid. > > > >I guess that means the video display, > > The most significant problem is the NeoMagic Chipset which is common in the > most recent batch of laptops. NeoMagic refuses to make information necessary > to write a driver for Xfree available. > > One of the commercial X servers does support the NeoMagic. > I think it costs about $100. You are thinking of the Desktop X server. For laptops you must shell out $199 to Xi Graphics. But just don't buy laptops with NeoMagic chips until they release programming info. Supporting NeoMagic is sort of like getting a Linux distribution sold by MicroSoft. I would suggest looking for a laptop with a Chips&Tech 65554. It fully supported in X *and* SVGAlib. -Brett.
Page 2 of 2 • 56 total messages
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads