Article View: comp.os.linux.help
Article #231Re: What's best for reliable BBS: SCO Unix, Linux, or NT?
From: Christian Pablo Tagtachian
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 23:39
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 23:39
23 lines
2012 bytes
2012 bytes
Joseph Hlebasko (hlebasko@lilly.com) wrote: : In article <2e2qca$sdf@gap.cco.caltech.edu> Daniel R. Kegel, : dank@cco.caltech.edu writes: : >Is Linux up to critical applications like this, or am I better off : >under SCO Unix? I suspect that either system requires a Unix weenie : >(like myself) to run it, and I'd much rather that it be easy to : >administer. : >For that matter, should I consider Microsoft Windows NT? : > : >Can you pass open file descriptors between processes under SCO? under : Linux? : >under NT? This seems like something I might want to do to pass calls : >from my frontend to a 3rd party backend. : > : >- Dan Kegel (dank@alumni.caltech.edu) : Or you might consider QNX for this application. : -Joseph Hlebasko Gosh no! I use QNX at work, I wouldn't even suggest to my worst enemy to use QNX unless you really need a real time unix like OS. Christian. <floyd@arthax.satlink.net> Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Dec14.233903.20258@arthax.satlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!a2i!satlink!arthax!floydReferences:
<1993Dec9.121008.819@inet.d48.lilly.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 100d18,7d31173f1282f35e X-Google-Attributes: gid100d18,public X-Google-Thread: fb9cd,7d31173f1282f35e X-Google-Attributes: gidfb9cd,public X-Google-Thread: 100b1f,7d31173f1282f35e X-Google-Attributes: gid100b1f,public X-Google-Thread: 1122ea,7d31173f1282f35e X-Google-Attributes: gid1122ea,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-12-15 02:56:15 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!a2i!satlink!arthax!floyd From: floyd@arthax.satlink.net (Christian Pablo Tagtachian) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.help,biz.sco.general,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.bbs.misc Subject: Re: What's best for reliable BBS: SCO Unix, Linux, or NT? Message-ID: <1993Dec14.233903.20258@arthax.satlink.net> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 23:39:03 GMT References: <1993Dec9.121008.819@inet.d48.lilly.com> Followup-To: comp.os.linux.help,biz.sco.general,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.bbs.misc Organization: Arthax, a ride into the unix world X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] Lines: 23