🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.os.linux.networking
3 messages
3 total messages Started by Berger Harald Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:44
bind 9.2, DDNS and Active Directory... only 1 question.. please help
#108
Author: Berger Harald
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:44
28 lines
1897 bytes
Hi,

im testing Bind 9.2 with W2k-Active Directory... after hours of work
the bind server runs and the W2k server works also.

a look at the zone file of the domain shows......

$origin.
test.com	in SOA ........
		(......
		....)
		NS ns1.test.com.

	 .... that the w2k server has created an A record:

$TTL 600	; 10 minutes
		A	172.16.10.10

my question:

if i take a real domainname (for internal and maybe also for 
external use) -> is it a good idea to create the
w2k domain at the top or
is it better to create a subdomain (ex:  win.test.com)
to put all the server and clients into the subdomain.

thanks for help
Re: bind 9.2, DDNS and Active Directory... only 1 question.. please help
#107
Author: Dean Thompson
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:39
52 lines
3517 bytes
Hi!,

> im testing Bind 9.2 with W2k-Active Directory... after hours of work
> the bind server runs and the W2k server works also.
> 
> a look at the zone file of the domain shows......
> 
> $origin.
> test.com        in SOA ........
>                 (......
>                 ....)
>                 NS ns1.test.com.
> 
>          .... that the w2k server has created an A record:
> 
> $TTL 600        ; 10 minutes
>                 A       172.16.10.10
> 
> my question:
> 
> if i take a real domainname (for internal and maybe also for
> external use) -> is it a good idea to create the
> w2k domain at the top or
> is it better to create a subdomain (ex:  win.test.com)
> to put all the server and clients into the subdomain.

By domain are you refering to the Windows concept of a domain or are you
talking about the domain of the company.  In theory, you would have it as the
top of your domain.  For example:

If you have a company with a domain name of "mycompany.com" and the domain
name is "mycompany", then you want the AD to register with your DNS server at
the top level.  That is: "myserver.mycompany.com" should be the intended
domain name structure you are looking for.  If you are creating a Win server
which forms a sub-domain within your company like "marketing", then you will
want to look at creating a subdomain rather than placing things at the top
level.

See ya

Dean Thompson

-- 
+____________________________+____________________________________________+
| Dean Thompson              | E-mail  - Dean.Thompson@csse.monash.edu.au |
| Bach. Computing (Hons)     | ICQ     - 45191180                         |
| PhD Student                | Office  - <Off-Campus>                     |
| School Comp.Sci & Soft.Eng | Phone   - +61 3 9903 2787 (Gen. Office)    |
| MONASH (Caulfield Campus)  | Fax     - +61 3 9903 1077                  |
| Melbourne, Australia       |                                            |
+----------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
Re: bind 9.2, DDNS and Active Directory... only 1 question.. please help
#106
Author: Berger Harald
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 17:30
51 lines
2931 bytes
thanks for information.....





On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:39:31 +1100, Dean Thompson
<Dean.Thompson@csse.monash.edu.au> wrote:

>
>Hi!,
>
>> im testing Bind 9.2 with W2k-Active Directory... after hours of work
>> the bind server runs and the W2k server works also.
>> 
>> a look at the zone file of the domain shows......
>> 
>> $origin.
>> test.com        in SOA ........
>>                 (......
>>                 ....)
>>                 NS ns1.test.com.
>> 
>>          .... that the w2k server has created an A record:
>> 
>> $TTL 600        ; 10 minutes
>>                 A       172.16.10.10
>> 
>> my question:
>> 
>> if i take a real domainname (for internal and maybe also for
>> external use) -> is it a good idea to create the
>> w2k domain at the top or
>> is it better to create a subdomain (ex:  win.test.com)
>> to put all the server and clients into the subdomain.
>
>By domain are you refering to the Windows concept of a domain or are you
>talking about the domain of the company.  In theory, you would have it as the
>top of your domain.  For example:
>
>If you have a company with a domain name of "mycompany.com" and the domain
>name is "mycompany", then you want the AD to register with your DNS server at
>the top level.  That is: "myserver.mycompany.com" should be the intended
>domain name structure you are looking for.  If you are creating a Win server
>which forms a sub-domain within your company like "marketing", then you will
>want to look at creating a subdomain rather than placing things at the top
>level.
>
>See ya
>
>Dean Thompson
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads