Thread View: comp.os.linux.networking
7 messages
7 total messages
Started by Chris Miles
Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00
Which Ethernet card?
Author: Chris Miles
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00
18 lines
1109 bytes
1109 bytes
Hi, I will be buying a pair of ethernet cards for my 2 home PC's
soon, one a P166 running both Win95 and Linux, and one a 486 just
running Linux.
I'm after any tips on which ethernet cards are recommended, or
which ones to stay away from. I will probably just pick up some
cheapies from a swap meet, but if there are some cards to avoid
I'd like to be aware of them!
Thanks
Chris.
--
Chris Miles - BSc(Hons)/BEng(Elec)(Hons) Unix System Admin
Unix Administrator/Programmer Linux Radius Computing
mailto:chris@melws1.rwc.org.au User! Australia
http://dracon.rwc.org.au/chris/ +613 9508 2468
Re: Which Ethernet card?
Author: Mark Heath
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00
21 lines
1359 bytes
1359 bytes
Chris Miles (chris@melws1.rwc.org.au) wrote: : I'm after any tips on which ethernet cards are recommended, or : which ones to stay away from. I will probably just pick up some : cheapies from a swap meet, but if there are some cards to avoid : I'd like to be aware of them! I'd stay away from jumperless cards, for linux, since the configuration utility is usually only for DOS. ( i dont know if linux has a config proggy for them) If you are after cheap cards you'd probably get an NE2000 clone. I found the jumperless ones were $45 when I bought one (isa 16bit), last year. Which I swapped for a Western Digital SMC 8013 card. -- -- mark heath | Netspace Online Systems mark@crafti.com.au | mheath@netspace.net.au | +61(0)411 224 397
Re: Which Ethernet card?
Author: Gary Curtis
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00
36 lines
2196 bytes
2196 bytes
Mark Heath wrote: > > Chris Miles (chris@melws1.rwc.org.au) wrote: > > : I'm after any tips on which ethernet cards are recommended, or > : which ones to stay away from. I will probably just pick up some > : cheapies from a swap meet, but if there are some cards to avoid > : I'd like to be aware of them! > > I'd stay away from jumperless cards, for linux, since the configuration > utility is usually only for DOS. ( i dont know if linux has a config > proggy for them) > If you are after cheap cards you'd probably get an NE2000 clone. > > I found the jumperless ones were $45 when I bought one (isa 16bit), last > year. Which I swapped for a Western Digital SMC 8013 card. I agree with your recommendation of an NE2000 clone. I use them in my machines at home (also running a combo of Windoze and Linux). The boffins might argue that the 3COM or WD cards could give you slightly better throughput. I have opted for the lower price and the universal availability of drivers. On the subject of the jumperless cards, I found the easiest solution to this was to create a DOS boot disk and copy the manufacturers config program onto it. You only ever need it once in a blue moon. If you were really paranoid you could keep an image of the floppy in Linux, and dd it to any old floppy if needed. Gaz ======================================================================== Gary R Curtis mailto:opus.logic@mailbox.uq.edu.au Brisbane, Queensland, Australia mailto:gaz@humbug.org.au ========================================================================
Re: Which Ethernet card?
Author: Ken Yap
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
19 lines
1844 bytes
1844 bytes
|>If you are after cheap cards you'd probably get an NE2000 clone. | |They don't work. NE2000 for some reason is an unreliable card interface. I |had one once and it caused the Linux box to lock up at random. The word |from Alan Cox was to stay clear of NE2000. This particular card was a |multi-interface card (I bought it ages ago especially so I could change |standards if there was some problem with Linux) and when I swapped to |use WD80x3 emulation it worked fine (nearly as well as the 3com cards). This info is probably old. After Paul Gortmaker finished cleaning it up by about 1.2.13 the NE2000 was much more reliable than before. It's still most commonly mentioned as having problems on news but that may be because it's the most common NIC sold. I have used several original NE2000s and clones since 1.2.13 and haven't had lockups due to the card. It's not the best interface (programmed I/O rather than shared memory or busmastering), but for light use, it's fine.
Re: Which Ethernet card?
Author: Warrick Bradney
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
28 lines
1805 bytes
1805 bytes
Mark Heath (mheath@netspace.net.au) wrote:
> Chris Miles (chris@melws1.rwc.org.au) wrote:
> : I'm after any tips on which ethernet cards are recommended, or
> : which ones to stay away from. I will probably just pick up some
> : cheapies from a swap meet, but if there are some cards to avoid
> : I'd like to be aware of them!
> I'd stay away from jumperless cards, for linux, since the configuration
> utility is usually only for DOS. ( i dont know if linux has a config
> proggy for them)
> If you are after cheap cards you'd probably get an NE2000 clone.
> I found the jumperless ones were $45 when I bought one (isa 16bit), last
> year. Which I swapped for a Western Digital SMC 8013 card.
I bought a pair of Plug & Pray NE2000 cards recently. I made sure the dealer
would refund my money if they did not work under Linux before i bought them.
I did need to run the MSDOS diagnostic program to set them up and after that
they have worked fine in both my machines - a 486/33 isa and a Cyrix 686/P150
on a HX motherboard running 2.0.29. isapnptools is essential to configuring
the card on the PCI bus. I don't do anything fancy, just play with nfs, telnet
httpd, etc.
regards,
warrick.
Re: Which Ethernet card?
Author: Manfred Bartz
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
17 lines
1165 bytes
1165 bytes
nick@zeta.org.au (Nick Andrew) writes: > In <5gqf4r$p0o$1@otis.netspace.net.au> mheath@netspace.net.au (Mark Heath) writes: > >If you are after cheap cards you'd probably get an NE2000 clone. > > They don't work. NE2000 for some reason is an unreliable card > interface. I have got 3 NE3000 clones - no problems. However, Linux has difficulty detecting NE2000 cards, but that is easily fixed with `append="ether=11,0x240,eth0"' (or whatever is appropriate for you) in lilo.conf -- Manfred Bartz <mbartz@werple.net.au>
Re: Which Ethernet card?
Author: Nick Andrew
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
24 lines
1684 bytes
1684 bytes
In <5gqf4r$p0o$1@otis.netspace.net.au> mheath@netspace.net.au (Mark Heath) writes: >I'd stay away from jumperless cards, for linux, since the configuration >utility is usually only for DOS. ( i dont know if linux has a config >proggy for them) I use 3c509 cards (jumperless). Yes, they do have to be programmed once, from DOS, but that's all. They work. >If you are after cheap cards you'd probably get an NE2000 clone. They don't work. NE2000 for some reason is an unreliable card interface. I had one once and it caused the Linux box to lock up at random. The word from Alan Cox was to stay clear of NE2000. This particular card was a multi-interface card (I bought it ages ago especially so I could change standards if there was some problem with Linux) and when I swapped to use WD80x3 emulation it worked fine (nearly as well as the 3com cards). Nick. -- Kralizec Dialup Internet System Data: +61-2-9837-1183, 9837-1868 Zeta Microcomputer Software Fax: +61-2-9837-3753 Voice: 9837-1397 P.O. Box 177, Riverstone NSW 2765 http://www.kralizec.net.au/
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads