🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1992Dec22.203221.20840@microsoft.com> jhenshaw@microsoft.com (Jeff Henshaw) writes:

>Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
>Subject: Re: Mach vs. NT
>Distribution: world
>Organization: Microsoft Corporation


>In <BzG3Gw.1s6@alsvid.une.edu.au>,
>mark@alsvid.une.edu.au (Mark Garrett) writes...

>| From article <1992Dec12.000250.14799@microsoft.com>, 
>| by jhenshaw@microsoft.com (Jeff Henshaw):
>| > 
>| > I think it would be safer to say that NT is "loosely based on
>| > Mach concepts" since some of the ideas (like a microkernel
>| > architecture) carry over.  NT also has a variety of subsystems
>|
>|	WindowsNT is based on the Mach3.0 micro kernel!!!!!!!!

>...

>|
>|	2. even worse, mach is part of windowsNT 

>...

>|	1. Go and do some reading before hitting the keyboard with replies
>|


>I've done some reading.  I've read the sources for
>both Mach and NT.

>Is there anything else you'd suggest I read before
>"hitting the keyboard with replies?"


>       ,       |
>               |/\
>______/| eff__/| / enshaw______________________________
>       |/        \/
>      /|                         jhenshaw@microsoft.com 
>      \|                   not a microsoft spokesperson

I think the original responder assumed that you were completely
incompetent because of the microsoft.com that is tacked on
after your name.  I, for one, find it amazing that *anyone*
at microsoft is capable of reading code...

-- 
Ken Bibb                "he heard the snow falling faintly through the
kbibb@qualcomm.com	 universe and faintly falling, like the descent of
jester@crash.cts.com     their last end, upon all the living and the dead."
				--"The Dead", James Joyce