Re: Mach vs. NT?

Thread View: comp.os.mach

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by John D. Ramsdell Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:23

#1091

Author: John D. Ramsdell
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:23

14 lines
989 bytes

In article <BzG3Gw.1s6@alsvid.une.edu.au> mark@alsvid.une.edu.au (Mark Garrett Internet: mark@arvak.une.edu.au Phone: +61 66 20 3859) writes:

...
	   WindowsNT is based on the Mach3.0 micro kernel!!!!!!!!

...
	   2. even worse, mach is part of windowsNT 
...

Please state your source for these claims.  They are at odds with
Dave Cutler's remarks and Helen Custer's book.  There is no excuse for
making sensational claims without providing any supporting evidence.

John

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads