Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Article #409Re: WINHELP.EXE replacement: summary and comments
From: Blake Coverett
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 03:49
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 03:49
58 lines
2631 bytes
2631 bytes
In article <_89m9t-.garyd@netcom.com> garyd@netcom.com (Gary Dietz) writes: >A) Full-text search > >A number of people said that beacuse windows help files are >compressed, that a full-text search would be slow. But then how does The multimedia Viewer product is an derivative of WinHelp. In fact, I browse Viewer files all the time with the standard WinHelp engine just by having the extension DLLs from Viewer in my system directory. Amongst many other things, Viewer gives full-text search capabilities on Viewer specific files. (It can read WinHelp files too, but can't do full-text searching on them because they don't have the additional index files.) Viewer and it's development tools are in the Multimedia Development Kit and I believe the engine itself is completely redistributable. >Yes, a good index is ALWAYS a good thing. They are just very hard to do >well. Ideally, I would like an index AND full-text search. I agree. >But, there is no real way to force very specific text flows and >bitmap placements. Plus, there is no way to turn off the >automatic re-flow of text when you re-size a help window. I'm not sure what you see as missing with bitmap placement/text wrapping. If you can give me a specific example I'll see if I can find a solution. The \keep RTF token makes the following paragraphs non-wrapping. You will get a horizontal scroll bar if the text is too wide for the window. >Plus, I am assuming that someobody will start to sell some stuff that >will take advantage of WINHELP 3.1's ability to call macros. Viewer is largely just that. Additionally I have seen some pretty slick general purpose infomation tools done using this technique. >E) Is there truth to the rumor that Microsoft disbanded their Help >group? No. >F) What is TPW? Turbo Pascal for Windows I presume. >A new help viewer would very likely require a new help compiler, as MS >fails to document the .HLP file format. Thus, they will change it the >minute someone comes out with a better viewer. This is just FUD. -Blake -- #include <std/disclaimer.h> blakeco@microsoft.com Mail Flames, Post Apologies. ...!uunet!microsoft!blakeco
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug20.034932.8998@microsoft.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!blakecoReferences:
<_89m9t-.garyd@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!blakeco From: blakeco@microsoft.com (Blake Coverett) Subject: Re: WINHELP.EXE replacement: summary and comments Message-ID: <1992Aug20.034932.8998@microsoft.com> Date: 20 Aug 92 03:49:32 GMT Organization: Microsoft Canada Inc. References: <_89m9t-.garyd@netcom.com> Lines: 58