Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Article #410Re: Has anyone seen this OWL problem?
From: Marius Kjeldahl
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 06:42
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 06:42
19 lines
1562 bytes
1562 bytes
In article <1992Aug19.193337.13958@centerline.com>, cparker@centerline.com (Charles Parker) writes: |> In article 28348@leland.Stanford.EDU, kmh@leland.Stanford.EDU (khanhmy hoang) writes: |> > My program using Borland's OWL (statically linked) worked perfectly |> > in Windows 3.0 and 3.1 when built using BC++ 3.0. |> > When built using BC++ 3.1, the program crashes in Windows 3.0 but |> > still works fine in Windows 3.1. |> > |> > I did define WIN30 during compilation, and this should give me backward |> > compatibility. But this is not what I get. |> > You are probably sending some wrong parameters (like an invalid handle or NULL pointer) to the Windows kernel. Windows 3.1 has more checking for validy of parameters than 3.0. You should try to obtain a program that logs and displays these errors to the kernel. I've seen one that comes with the Microsoft compiler 7.0, called DBWin, it`s great for detecting such errors... Marius
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug20.064253.22151@ugle.unit.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!ugle.unit.no!sigyn.idt.unit.no!mariuskReferences:
<1992Aug12.080756.28348@leland.Stanford.EDU> <1992Aug19.193337.13958@centerline.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!ugle.unit.no!sigyn.idt.unit.no!mariusk From: mariusk@idt.unit.no (Marius Kjeldahl) Subject: Re: Has anyone seen this OWL problem? Message-ID: <1992Aug20.064253.22151@ugle.unit.no> Sender: news@ugle.unit.no (NetNews Administrator) Reply-To: mariusk@idt.unit.no (Marius Kjeldahl) Organization: Div. of CS & Telematics, Norwegian Institute of Technology References: <1992Aug12.080756.28348@leland.Stanford.EDU> <1992Aug19.193337.13958@centerline.com> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 06:42:53 GMT Lines: 20