Re: Microsoft C 5.1/6.0 Question

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #7774

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#7774

From: Mounil Patel
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 20:20

15 lines
1153 bytes

>Microsoft C 5.1/6.0 Question
In article <1k3kmiINNnmn@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu> Charles Bennett
Smith, bsmith@ecst.csuchico.edu writes:
>I was wondering if anyone had information on Microsoft C 6.0.  The
>company I am working for is still using Microsoft C 5.1 because they
>maintain that 6.0 was very buggy and did not work properly.  The thing
>is, they are not using any optimizer switches on the 5.1 compiler because
>they apparently don't work correctly.

I advise you to stick with MSC 5.1. MSC 6.0 had a lot of problems which
caused us to step back to 5.1. I really think C/C++ 7.0 is the best
choice, and it is still a full ANSI C compiler, but that's not an option
for you.

-Mounil

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C1H9u1.I3C@MathWorks.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!opl.com!hri.com!noc.near.net!MathWorks.Com!nuntius

References: <1k3kmiINNnmn@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!opl.com!hri.com!noc.near.net!MathWorks.Com!nuntius
From: mounil@mathworks.com (Mounil Patel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Microsoft C 5.1/6.0 Question
Message-ID: <C1H9u1.I3C@MathWorks.COM>
Date: 26 Jan 93 20:20:25 GMT
References: <1k3kmiINNnmn@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu>
Sender: news@MathWorks.COM (Usenet News Account)
Organization: The MathWorks, Inc.
Lines: 15
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1

Reply to Parent Message