Re: DOS is dead.

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #811

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#811

From: Leonard Erickson
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 23:00

14 lines
1017 bytes

nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson) writes:

>DOS is dead.  (At most) A year from now no one will be programming for MS-DOS.

I hate to burst your bubble, but there are still people programming
for CP/M and TRSDOS! MS-DOS isn't going away soon. 

This is a lot like the regular predictions of "the imminent death of
Usenet". :-)
-- 
Leonard Erickson		      leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com
CIS: [70465,203]			 70465.203@compuserve.com
FIDO:   1:105/56	 Leonard.Erickson@f56.n105.z1.fidonet.org
(The CIS address is checked daily. The others infrequently)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr16.230020.18555@qiclab.scn.rain.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psgrain!qiclab!leonard

References: <703214134snx@crynwr.com> <1992Apr16.025838.17912@cheops.qld.tne.oz.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psgrain!qiclab!leonard
From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson)
Subject: Re: DOS is dead.
Message-ID: <1992Apr16.230020.18555@qiclab.scn.rain.com>
Reply-To: 70465.203@compuserve.com
Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.
References: <703214134snx@crynwr.com> <1992Apr16.025838.17912@cheops.qld.tne.oz.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 23:00:20 GMT
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message