Article View: comp.os.netware.connectivity
Article #113Re: Should new server be 802.2 or Ethernet II?
From: bainster
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00
36 lines
2081 bytes
2081 bytes
bdhuskey@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (Brian Huskey) wrote: >I thought the default frame type for 3.x was 802.3 and that it was not >until 4.x that the default became 802.2. >Phil Randal <philr@hwcces.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>In article <4uasq3$s0m@caladan.restena.lu> >> marcel.cox@cie.etat.lu (Marcel Cox) writes: >>>First 2 things to clear up: >>> >>>- Packet burst works with any frame type >>> >>>- The only thing that does not work with all frame types is IPX >>>checksums( this is not packet signature). This does not work with >>>Ethernet_802.3. >>> >>>As for what frame type is best, I think everyone has its own favorite. >>>I think Ethernet_SNAP is the only frame type that nobody recommends >>>using. >>>Personally I prefer using Ethernet_802.2 as it is the default frame >>>type for Netware 3.12 and 4.x and it minimizes the risk of selecting >>>the wrong frame type. >>If you're _ever_ going to run TCP/IP on your network, go for Ethernet_II >>frame type. Shucks, go for it anyway:-) >>------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Phil Randal philr@hwcces.demon.co.uk >>Environmental Services Department >>Hereford and Worcester County Council >>Worcester, UK The default for 3.11 is 802.3. For 3.12 and higher (4.x) it is 802.2.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4umbd2$kj6@usenet10.interramp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32075b60.4395812@news.execpc.com> <4uasq3$s0m@caladan.restena.lu> <839539320snx@hwcces.demon.co.uk> <4ud5f1$55o@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe659,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: fa939,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidfa939,public X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public From: bainster@interramp.com Subject: Re: Should new server be 802.2 or Ethernet II? Date: 1996/08/12 Message-ID: <4umbd2$kj6@usenet10.interramp.com> X-Deja-AN: 173627606 references: <32075b60.4395812@news.execpc.com> <4uasq3$s0m@caladan.restena.lu> <839539320snx@hwcces.demon.co.uk> <4ud5f1$55o@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> organization: PSI Public Usenet Link newsgroups: comp.os.netware.connectivity,bit.listserv.novell,comp.os.netware.misc