Article View: comp.os.netware.connectivity
Article #114Re: Should new server be 802.2 or Ethernet II?
From: Hansang Bae
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00
17 lines
1514 bytes
1514 bytes
gary@scisysgw.sci.com (Gary Heston) writes: [snip] >central server (NW 3.11), we only use two frame types since it's all >supposed to be NW 4.1 and TCP/IP. We figured it'd be less hassle to >require all connections to the Corporate net use only the NW 4.x and >TCP/IP standard frames, thus minimizing the workload on the Corporate >support staff. >It doesn't hurt anything to bind both 802.2 and 802.3 to the NIC, and >can avoid a lot of headaches. Unless you have to have a lot of servers using SAP for updates. (And haven't upgraded to NLSP). If you have a world wide network (and still not using NLSP), then binding ipx to two frame types can cause a significant overhead for hte WAN links. hsb
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ums7l$7ag@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4uasq3$s0m@caladan.restena.lu> <839539320snx@hwcces.demon.co.uk> <4ud5f1$55o@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> <Dw02EG.F1B@scisysgw.sci.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe659,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: fa939,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidfa939,public X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public From: hbae@primenet.com (Hansang Bae) Subject: Re: Should new server be 802.2 or Ethernet II? Date: 1996/08/12 Message-ID: <4ums7l$7ag@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> X-Deja-AN: 173661113 references: <4uasq3$s0m@caladan.restena.lu> <839539320snx@hwcces.demon.co.uk> <4ud5f1$55o@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> <Dw02EG.F1B@scisysgw.sci.com> organization: Primenet Services for the Internet x-posted-by: hbae@206.165.5.106 (hbae) newsgroups: comp.os.netware.connectivity,bit.listserv.novell,comp.os.netware.misc