Article View: comp.os.netware.connectivity
Article #364Re: 3.12 or 4.11? Comments invited!
From: Chris Mallinson
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 00:00
56 lines
3697 bytes
3697 bytes
As a consultant i am often comfronted with similar problems by my clients, i have to take into mind further developments and weigh them up against company functionality. True Netware 4x is in my my opinion a far better system than 3.12 however as a end user you can get more support from other companys that cannot support 4.x. There is also the fact that most applications that run on a Novell system are not NDS aware and therefore you could in effect have a inoporational system . My advice is to ask the company why they didnt install 4.x and ask for it a plain termonology. PS when you get to understand netware 4.x NDS it rocks Wilson Wong <wilsonw@hkstar.net> wrote in article <55f6k0$bi5@capella.hkstar.com>... > "Paul Ayling" <mabm07@dial.pipex.com> wrote: > > > >Hi - Can anybody commment on this scenario: > > >I've just upgraded my Windows 95 peer to peer network of 6 computers to > >Novell 3.12. Or rather my supplier has done so. That was about 4 weeks ago. > >All is going fine, but I found out only last Friday that NetWare 4.1 has > >been around for about 18 months. And its cheaper. > > >Warning bells are beginning to sound. My supplier never told me there was > >an option. What's more, as we plan to get involved with the Internet, it > >seems that I would love to upgrade to IntraNetware - but can't. > > >My supplier tells me that they didn't recommend 4.1 because the server > >hardware they had pigeonholed for the task (an old 66Mhz 486) wasn't up to > >the job. Yet according to Novell's web site, this isn't true. For the > >record, it is a > >486/66 with 32Mb RAM, and sports a mirrored pair of 2GB SCSI hard disk > >drives. (Comments here would be especially welcome.) > > >Generally, can anybody see the rationale for a company new to the world of > >Novell networking starting off with 3.12 in September 1996? > > >All comments would be very gratefully received. > > >Paul Ayling > >Writing Machine, Winchester, Hants, UK > > The world is changing. I don't like Win95 but I still work with it. > Netware 3.12 is much suitable for a small Lan but the price of 3.12 > and 4.1 is same, at least in my place. I think Novell would add more > function to 4.1 but not 3.12 so we still have to learn more and more. > If you install a 3.12 OS to your company , your boss will ask you why > you install a old version. It is nothing to do with technical view. > > Wilson Wong > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bbcff1$7fd2a5c0$f090989e@netsol.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bbbb64$a2d96320$98fe82c1@ac31.dial.pipex.com> <55f6k0$bi5@capella.hkstar.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10349c,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gid10349c,public X-Google-Thread: fc1d4,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gidfc1d4,public X-Google-Thread: fa939,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gidfa939,public X-Google-Thread: 10bb2e,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb2e,public X-Google-Thread: fcc1d,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gidfcc1d,public X-Google-Thread: 12bd52,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gid12bd52,public X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public X-Google-Thread: 111d40,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gid111d40,public From: "Chris Mallinson" <Chris.Mallinson@netsol.co.uk> Subject: Re: 3.12 or 4.11? Comments invited! Date: 1996/11/11 Message-ID: <01bbcff1$7fd2a5c0$f090989e@netsol.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 195797402 x-nntp-posting-host: netsol.demon.co.uk references: <01bbbb64$a2d96320$98fe82c1@ac31.dial.pipex.com> <55f6k0$bi5@capella.hkstar.com> organization: Networking Solutions newsgroups: comp.os.netware.connectivity,comp.os.netware.misc,cz.net.netware,fido.novell,fido.novell-ch,swnet.lans.novell,tw.bbs.comp.novell,umn.local-lists.novell