🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.netware.connectivity
Article #366

Re: 3.12 or 4.11? Comments invited!

#366
From: shaun
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 00:00
40 lines
2790 bytes
3.12 was an excellent product for a single site single server lan, works
performs well but you may need to take your server down one a month to stop
memeory leaking away..

Anything larger use 4.xx excellent for wan use if you dont use ISDN2, and
have leased circuits and know how to partition and seup time
syncronisation.

Lets face it .. keep it simple????

Shaun
Leeds
UK

David Ehrens <david@pencilnet.com> wrote in article
<56dpom$2bo_002@iriscom.ici.net>...
> In article <01bbcff1$7fd2a5c0$f090989e@netsol.demon.co.uk>, "Chris
Mallinson" <Chris.Mallinson@netsol.co.uk> wrote:
> ..
> >you could in effect have a inoporational system . My advice is to ask
the
> >company why they didnt install 4.x and ask for it a plain termonology...
> ..
> 
> I'm not sure if it is your intent to suggest here that installing 3.12
instead 
> of 4.1 is somehow unprofessional or slipshod.  Believe it or not, there
*are* 
> some good reasons for choosing 3.12 over 4.1 in certain cases --
particularly 
> where training is concerned.
> 
> +-----------------------------+------------------------------------+
> |  David Ehrens               |  email: david@pencilnet.com        |
> |  Pencil/NET, Inc.           |  phone: (508) 999-5259             |
> |  1750 Purchase Street       |  fax:   (508) 999-0107             |
> |  New Bedford, MA 02740      |  WWW:   http://www.pencilnet.com   |
> +-----------------------------+------------------------------------+
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <01bbd27e$fb848960$4398d8c2@spider.blinkleeds.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <01bbbb64$a2d96320$98fe82c1@ac31.dial.pipex.com> <55f6k0$bi5@capella.hkstar.com> <01bbcff1$7fd2a5c0$f090989e@netsol.demon.co.uk> <56dpom$2bo_002@iriscom.ici.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10349c,d76956f03495c74a
X-Google-Attributes: gid10349c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bb2e,d76956f03495c74a
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb2e,public
X-Google-Thread: fcc1d,d76956f03495c74a
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcc1d,public
X-Google-Thread: 111d40,d76956f03495c74a
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d40,public
X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,d76956f03495c74a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public
X-Google-Thread: fa939,d76956f03495c74a
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa939,public
X-Google-Thread: fc1d4,d76956f03495c74a
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc1d4,public
X-Google-Thread: 12bd52,d76956f03495c74a
X-Google-Attributes: gid12bd52,public
From: "shaun" <shaunl@blinkleeds.co.uk>
Subject: Re: 3.12 or 4.11? Comments invited!
Date: 1996/11/14
Message-ID: <01bbd27e$fb848960$4398d8c2@spider.blinkleeds.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 196525043
references: <01bbbb64$a2d96320$98fe82c1@ac31.dial.pipex.com> <55f6k0$bi5@capella.hkstar.com> <01bbcff1$7fd2a5c0$f090989e@netsol.demon.co.uk> <56dpom$2bo_002@iriscom.ici.net>
organization: UUNet PIPEX server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNet PIPEX)
newsgroups: comp.os.netware.connectivity,comp.os.netware.misc,cz.net.netware,fido.novell,fido.novell-ch,swnet.lans.novell,tw.bbs.comp.novell,umn.local-lists.novell