Article View: comp.os.netware.connectivity
Article #366Re: 3.12 or 4.11? Comments invited!
From: shaun
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 00:00
40 lines
2790 bytes
2790 bytes
3.12 was an excellent product for a single site single server lan, works performs well but you may need to take your server down one a month to stop memeory leaking away.. Anything larger use 4.xx excellent for wan use if you dont use ISDN2, and have leased circuits and know how to partition and seup time syncronisation. Lets face it .. keep it simple???? Shaun Leeds UK David Ehrens <david@pencilnet.com> wrote in article <56dpom$2bo_002@iriscom.ici.net>... > In article <01bbcff1$7fd2a5c0$f090989e@netsol.demon.co.uk>, "Chris Mallinson" <Chris.Mallinson@netsol.co.uk> wrote: > .. > >you could in effect have a inoporational system . My advice is to ask the > >company why they didnt install 4.x and ask for it a plain termonology... > .. > > I'm not sure if it is your intent to suggest here that installing 3.12 instead > of 4.1 is somehow unprofessional or slipshod. Believe it or not, there *are* > some good reasons for choosing 3.12 over 4.1 in certain cases -- particularly > where training is concerned. > > +-----------------------------+------------------------------------+ > | David Ehrens | email: david@pencilnet.com | > | Pencil/NET, Inc. | phone: (508) 999-5259 | > | 1750 Purchase Street | fax: (508) 999-0107 | > | New Bedford, MA 02740 | WWW: http://www.pencilnet.com | > +-----------------------------+------------------------------------+ >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bbd27e$fb848960$4398d8c2@spider.blinkleeds.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bbbb64$a2d96320$98fe82c1@ac31.dial.pipex.com> <55f6k0$bi5@capella.hkstar.com> <01bbcff1$7fd2a5c0$f090989e@netsol.demon.co.uk> <56dpom$2bo_002@iriscom.ici.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10349c,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gid10349c,public X-Google-Thread: 10bb2e,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb2e,public X-Google-Thread: fcc1d,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gidfcc1d,public X-Google-Thread: 111d40,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gid111d40,public X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public X-Google-Thread: fa939,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gidfa939,public X-Google-Thread: fc1d4,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gidfc1d4,public X-Google-Thread: 12bd52,d76956f03495c74a X-Google-Attributes: gid12bd52,public From: "shaun" <shaunl@blinkleeds.co.uk> Subject: Re: 3.12 or 4.11? Comments invited! Date: 1996/11/14 Message-ID: <01bbd27e$fb848960$4398d8c2@spider.blinkleeds.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 196525043 references: <01bbbb64$a2d96320$98fe82c1@ac31.dial.pipex.com> <55f6k0$bi5@capella.hkstar.com> <01bbcff1$7fd2a5c0$f090989e@netsol.demon.co.uk> <56dpom$2bo_002@iriscom.ici.net> organization: UUNet PIPEX server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNet PIPEX) newsgroups: comp.os.netware.connectivity,comp.os.netware.misc,cz.net.netware,fido.novell,fido.novell-ch,swnet.lans.novell,tw.bbs.comp.novell,umn.local-lists.novell