🚀 go-pugleaf

In article a says...
>
>On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 01:04:44, rolan@ibm.net.nospam (Rolan) wrote:
>
>> I'm getting desperate for an update to OS/2 Warp.  I'm
>> currently on Warp 4.0 FP 10 with the latest available
>> MPTS and TCP/IP fixes...I think.  It's a real hassle
>> keeping up with all the different fixes and was wondering
>> whether it would be worth it to get Aurora and use it
>> as a client.
>
>What do you think Aurora will do that Warp4 can't do?
>What do you find desparately inadequate about Warp4?
>
>
>gbritton@!britton.dhs.org
>gbritton@!home.com
>http://britton.ml.org (always under construction and soon to be 
>britton.dhs.org)
>ICQ=14408745  
>

I'm looking to start from a base where I know I have the
latest fixes for all components.  At the moment, the multimedia
apps that came with Warp seems to be broken, I'm not really sure
why but I think a fixpack broke them.  I am also looking to using
USB devices, in particular a video conference camera, and I am
hoping that USB support has been integrated into the Aurora release,
instead of the ones currently provided in the online DDPK.
I've also updated my OpenGL to try to fix a problem with EscapeGL
with some of modules.  I just want to be sure that I've applied the
correct updates and I have done them correctly.  I wish a one Fixpack
would be released the encompasses all fixes including MPTS, TCP/IP, OpenGL
etc.

I guess the other reason why I am looking at Aurora as a client 
is that I am finding more and more reasons to not use OS/2.  
I've been using it since 1992 and would like to prolong it, since
its still better than the alternative.

Cheers,
Randy
=============
rolan@ibm.net