Re: OS/2 dead? Yes, it is!

Article View: comp.os.os2.apps

Article #4666

#4666

From: Emre Kiciman
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 00:00

16 lines
1339 bytes

Mustafa Soysal MS57 wrote:

> 
> >definitely did not come with my compiler, Watcom 10.0b.  Maybe I'll

> Watcom isn't the IBM compiler.  The IBM compiler is VAC++.  Besides, I
> thought Watcom stopped developing for OS/2.

As far as I know Watcom compilers still support OS/2.  In v11 they
didn't upgrade the IDE or toolkit at all, but the compiler people have
continued to improve the actual OS/2 compiler.  And FYI, I don't know
this first hand (I still have Watcom v10.6) but read this information
on the c.o.o.* newsgroup somewhere.

Emre |=^)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <333EC5A3.45C8@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <3329D9CF.59E2B600@visix.com> <lqWPz0E6Ah5c092yn@momeraths.org> <5hm4og$mjj@client2.news.psi.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,cc256aafa6f1bcba
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public
From: Emre Kiciman <emrek@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: OS/2 dead? Yes, it is!
Date: 1997/03/30
Message-ID: <333EC5A3.45C8@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 229492944
References: <5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <3329D9CF.59E2B600@visix.com> <lqWPz0E6Ah5c092yn@momeraths.org> <5hm4og$mjj@client2.news.psi.net>
Organization: A customer of Pacific Bell Internet Services
Reply-To: emrek@uclink4.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l

Reply to Parent Message