Article View: comp.os.os2.apps
Article #4673Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk.
From: crobato
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 00:00
117 lines
5492 bytes
5492 bytes
In <5hc595$ooo@client3.news.psi.net>, os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) writes: >In article <y57NzgRDAgKT091yn@bigblue.no>, B. Vermo <bv@bigblue.no> wrote: >>In article <5h35l6$m49@client3.news.psi.net>, >>os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) wrote: >> >>|Experiencing IBMs support inabilities for several years turned me to NT >>|or linux. >> >>Free Linux has typical DIY support. Does commercial Linux have any support >>in your area? And does Microsoft have any support beyond salespeople, > >IBM doesn't have any serious support, and you get better support with >linux over the net when you make a bug report.... Microsoft asks for >support pay, a lot less than IBM asks for. Face it, paying for 3 Oh? $150 on a call for network support, and that's just for a fucking phone call if they don't hold you on the phone. For $200 bucks, I can get an IBM technician to come to my site and fix a real problem. >incidences when you need one is the cost of support for one incidence, >and especially if this is aabout an OS trap or file system lockup you >are getting, and they aren't able to provide a fix within the warranty >support period, why would you consider paying for that lack of support? > >>trainees and 'he is not in today's? >> >>I have often thought IBM support was bad. Then I remembered the >>alternative, and it immediately seemed to improve. But I have worked >>with computers for thirty years, and do not need all that much support. > >Same here, all I need support for is whn the OS/2 slowsdown to a halt >for a while when the disk fragmenates peridically or when the file >system locks up locking up the entire system, or when the OS/2 traps. >And, I didn't get any support to fix these problems. They denied that >these problems ever existed. They said my RAM memory is probably going >bad suggesting that I reseat them (if it ain't broken, don't fix them). > My FAT disk is heavily fragmented, but where the fuck is the slow down or the system locking up because of that. This is on a system that crashes on the average on once in a month or two. >Yet, a few fixpacks later, I see some of the problems being listed in >the fix history. Others are still not fixed. When I offered something >that reproduces the problem 100%, they declined saying that program was >no longer supported, yet it duplicates the very problem on keypress >which exists when I run the system for more than 24 hours.... > >>I could manage Linux, but would never dream of using it in a production >>setting. For that purpose you definitely need commercial UNIX - like >>AT&T/NCR, not SCO! Or even a real computer like HP-9000 or IBM RS/6000. > >;) What makes you think that AT&T unix is better than IBM OS/2? Now, HP >is slightly different, yet, I wouldn't really trust their support >either. > >>That would be the alternative for me if OS/2 is not adequate for the > >Pardon my correction. OS/2 would be adequate if IBM was supporting and >cleaning up bugs...IBM is inadequate, not OS/2, which makes OS/2 junk. > >>task. But I would consider very seriously to use OS/2 on the RS/6000... > >IBM has done the same foot dragging on AIX, and there is noindication >based on past experience that IBM would do any different on any >platform. Funny, why did VARs vote AIX the top Unix on a dead tie with Solaris? Why is RS/6000 the fastest growing IBM platform on the Far East? > >>OS/2 for PowerPc is the basis for Warp 5 and has the new device driver >>model and SMP microkernel in place. >> > >Well, the current one isn't working, what makes me think that the next According to how my system works so smoothly and fine, the current one works, so you can bet I look forward to the next one. >one will? There is even more problems with SMP... What problems? > What did God tell you about His Commandments once again? Rgds, Chris >Best Regards, > >Mustafa Soysal > >-- >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Mustafa Soysal (313) 741-1844 Voice TeamOS/2 >MISTIK Systems (313) 741-1937 Fax Author of UnTieCom(tm) >PO Box 7064 Authorized Motorola Reseller >Ann Arbor, MI 48107-7064, USA os2@mistik.express.net > Online catalog: http://www.express.net/mistik/ >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > *** The Windows Guide to Impotence *** Abort, Retry, Fail??? Abort, Retry, Fail??? Abort, Retry, Fail??? >>>crobato@kuentos.guam.net<<<
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5hgjg4$eem@lehi.kuentos.guam.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu> <CZGNzsbnbFDf089yn@ibm.net> <5h35l6$m49@client3.news.psi.net> <y57NzgRDAgKT091yn@bigblue.no> <5hc595$ooo@client3.news.psi.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18 X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,cc256aafa6f1bcba X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public From: crobato@kuentos.guam.net Subject: Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk. Date: 1997/03/28 Message-ID: <5hgjg4$eem@lehi.kuentos.guam.net> X-Deja-AN: 229006969 References: <5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu> <CZGNzsbnbFDf089yn@ibm.net> <5h35l6$m49@client3.news.psi.net> <y57NzgRDAgKT091yn@bigblue.no> <5hc595$ooo@client3.news.psi.net> Organization: Kuentos Communications Inc. Reply-To: crobato@kuentos.guam.net Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l