🚀 go-pugleaf

In <5dtqgv$3l2@news1.ee.net>, selfinger@ee.net (Bob Selfinger) writes:
>In message <33019D58.1CB9@cam.ac.uk> - Stephen Turner <sret1@cam.ac.uk>
>writes:
>:>
>:>David Zuidema wrote:
>:>> 
>:>> >Oh and there was alot of net speculation that the damn thing cheats! I'm
>:>> >not a backgammon slouch but it could trash me consistently. And it always
>:>> >seemed to get the die rolls it needed to cover an otherwise vulnerable
>:>> >position...
>:>> 
>:>> I'm glad that someone else thinks the die rolls were too good to be
>:>> true ! I thought I was going paranoid. :-)
>:>> 
>
>I have been suspecting that it cheats very badly at times but not always.
>Maybe it looks at the date or some other thing to decide when it will
>cheat.  Some days I can beat it every time, but on some days it will roll
>exactly what it needs again and again and it is just about unbeatable in
>this mode.
> 
>:>
>:>Good players get more good rolls than bad players. What's new?
>:>
>:>-- 
>:>Stephen Turner     sret1@cam.ac.uk      http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
>:>  Stochastic Networks Group, Statistical Laboratory,
>:>  16 Mill Lane, Cambridge, CB2 1SB, England    Tel.: +44 1223 337955
>:>  "Collection of rent is subject to Compulsive Competitive Tendering" Cam. City
>
>Bob Selfinger
>******************************************************
>Views expressed here may not actually be views.
>******************************************************
>