🚀 go-pugleaf

Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
tholed:
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce writes:
>
> >>>>> Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Dickless Davie tholoon@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
> >>>>>>> tholed:
>
> >>>>>>>> The ones you removed from your follow-up, Bruce.  Classic evasion.
>
> >>>>>>> "Clasic" lie, Dickless. No lines or words were removed by me in my
> >>>>>>> follow-up. You would know that by now, had you better reading
> >>>>>>> "comprehenion" skills, Dickless.
>
> >>>>>> This oar pin has a "lassic" inferiority complex, Bruce, he's posted at
> >>>>>> least 22 "responses" to cooa in the last 16 hours and he's probably not
> >>>>>> done yet. Yikes!  He's got it bad...
>
> >>>>> I know, Bruce.
>
> >>>> Why are you addressing Joe Malloy as "Bruce", Bruce?  Still suffering
> >>>> from attribution problems?
>
> >>> Your cluelessness and stupidity noted,
>
> >> Classic projection.  I see that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.
> >> No surprise there, really.
>
> > "Clasic" projection and evasion,
>
> I'm well aware of your projection and evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell
> me about it.

"lassic" evasion and projection on your part, Dickless. No surprise,
really.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>> Who is "Bruce",
>
> >> Still suffering from schizophrenia, Bruce?
>
> > On your part,
>
> Non sequitur.

"Clasic" illogic, Dickless.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>> Dickless?
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > Who is "Bruce",
>
> Still suffering from schizophrenia, Bruce?

On your part, Dickless.

> > Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> Still suffering from reading "comprehenion" problems?
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> > On your part,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>>>> No need to remind me of Dickless' "clasic" inferiority
> >>>>> complex.
>
> >>>> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.
>
> >>> Your cluelessness and stupidity noted once again,
>
> >> Classic projection.  I see that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.
> >> No surprise there, really.
>
> > "Clasic" stupidity on your part,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

"Clasic" projection, Dickless.  I see that you didn't answer the
question, Dickless. No surprise there, really.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > No surprise there, really.
>
> That you would make an unsubstantiated and erroneous claim is indeed
> no surprise, Bruce.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>> Who is "Bruce",
>
> >> Still suffering from schizophrenia, Bruce?
>
> > "Clasic" repetition of "lassic" stupidity,
>
> Is that how you choose to describe your question about the name you've
> been using, Bruce?

"Clasic" evasion, Dickless.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > No surprise there, really.
>
> What does your lack of surprise have to do with colored text in
> DeScribe, Bruce?

That's what I'm asking you, Dickless.

> >>> Dickless?
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>> Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> > On your part,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Note: no response.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>>>> He's insanely jealous of us because, like his siblings, we're
> >>>>> all better than him.
>
> >>>> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.
>
> >>> "Clasic" hallucination,
>
> >> Is that your explanation for your use of a name for a person not
> >> involved in the discussion, Bruce?
>
> > Who would that be,
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

On your part, Dickless.

> > Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > Still hallucinating?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

On your part, Dickless.

> > No surprise there, really.
>
> That you would make another erroneous presupposition is indeed no
> surprise, Bruce.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>>>>> Still, it doesn't match his record which is about 125 postings in 24
> >>>>>> hours.  Gosh, you'd think an astrologer would have more to do than he does.
>
> >>>>> He obviously doesn't work out his ephemerides with a pencil, Bruce,
> >>>>> like every good astrologer should.
>
> >>>> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.
>
> >>> "Clasic" stupidity,
>
> >> Is that your explanation for your use of a name for a person not
> >> involved in the discussion, Bruce?
>
> > Who would that be,
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

On your part, Dickless.

> > Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

On your part, Dickless.

> > Still hallucinating?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

On your part, Dickless.

> > No surprise there, really.
>
> That you would make another erroneous presupposition is indeed no
> surprise, Bruce.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.

Note: no response from Dickless. No surprise there, really.

> >>>>>> Hey, Dickless, here's a simple task: Get your favorite word processor to
> >>>>>> print a sentence in which each letter is in a different color.  Ha!
>
> >>>>> He'd sooner do it in FORTRAN, Bruce - once he gets his FORTRAN code
> >>>>> fixed.
>
> >>>> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.
>
> >>> "Clasic" hallucination,
>
> >> Is that your explanation for your use of a name for a person not
> >> involved in the discussion, Bruce?
>
> > Who would that be,
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

On your part, Dickless.

> > Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

On your part, Dickless.

> > Still hallucinating?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

On your part, Dickless.

> > No surprise there, really.
>
> That you would make another erroneous presupposition is indeed no
> surprise, Bruce.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> If you had better reading
> >>> "comprehenion" and logic skills, Dickless,
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> you would realise by now
> >>> that you are responding to us when we call you Dickless,
>
> >> Who are "us" and "we", Bruce?  Still suffering from schizophrenia?
>
> > Lack of a clue on your part noted,
>
> I see that you didn't answer the questions, Bruce.  No surprise there
> really.  Rather ironic that you would demonstrate the lack of a clue.

On your part, Dickless.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>> Therefore, this implies tacit admission that you acknowledge your
> >>> nickname.
>
> >> Classic illogic, coupled with an unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > On your part,
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Dickless.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

On your part, Dickless.

> > Now, what does your ongoing antagonism have to do with coloured text in
> > DeScribe,
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

On your part, Dickless.

> > Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

"Clasic" evasion, Dickless.