🚀 go-pugleaf

Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
tholed:
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce writes:
>
> >>>>>> Joseph Malloy writes:
>
> >>>>>>> This oar pin has a "lassic" inferiority complex, Bruce, he's posted at
> >>>>>>> least 22 "responses" to cooa in the last 16 hours and he's probably not
> >>>>>>> done yet. Yikes!  He's got it bad...
>
> >>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who is not done yet.
>
> >>>>> Are they your famous last words,
>
> >>>> What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Bruce?
>
> >>> Non sequitur and another ironic "lassic" evasion,
>
> >> I'm well aware that your failure to answer the question constitutes
> >> evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.
>
> > Another "Clasic" evasion on your part,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > No surprise there, really.
>
> That you would make yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim is
> indeed no surprise, Bruce.
>
> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>>>> Dickless?
>
> >>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>> "Clasic" stupidity,
>
> >> Is that your explanation for your attribution problem, Bruce?
>
> > On your part,
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > If you weren't so stupid, you would know that by now.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>>>>>> Still, it doesn't match his record which is about 125 postings in 24
> >>>>>>> hours.  Gosh, you'd think an astrologer would have more to do than he does.
>
> >>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who has more to do than be an
> >>>>>> antagonist on USENET.
>
> >>>>> Yes, Bruce AKA the alleged Joe Malloy has done more on Usenet,
>
> >>>> What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Bruce?
>
> >>> What does that have to do with classical music,
>
> >> I see that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.  No surprise there,
> >> really.
>
> > Note: no response.
>
> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.  No need to
> tell me.
>
> >>> Dickless?
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>>>> Dickless.
>
> >>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>> What does that have to do with coloured text in DeScribe,
>
> >> The subject line says "Malloy digest", Bruce.
>
> > Not any more,
>
> Doesn't change the fact that you asked about an irrelevant subject,
> Bruce.  Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?

"Clasic" evasion, Dickless. Are you a complete idiot or not?

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
>
> > Note: no response.
>
> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.  No need to
> tell me.

Note: no response.

> >>> Dickless?
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>>>> You would know that by now, had you better reading
> >>>>> "comprehenion" skills.
>
> >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> >>> On your part,
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > On your part,
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

Who is "Malloy", Dickless?

> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>>>>>> Hey, Dickless, here's a simple task: Get your favorite word processor to
> >>>>>>> print a sentence in which each letter is in a different color.  Ha!
>
> >>>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>>>> "Clasic" evasion,
>
> >>>> I'm well aware that your failure to answer the questions constitutes
> >>>> evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.
>
> >>> What questions,
>
> >> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?
>
> > Its evident you are,
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

Who is "Malloy", Dickless? And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

> >>> Dickless?
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>> I am the one asking you the questions around here.
>
> >> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?
>
> > Its evident you are,
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

Who is "Malloy", Dickless? And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

> >>> You are the one evading them.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > On your part,
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

Who is "Malloy", Dickless? And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

> >>> No need to remind me of your evasion.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> > On your part,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

Who is "Malloy", Dickless? And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

> >>>>> Dickless.
>
> >>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>>>> To be expected of someone who evades all questions put to him.
>
> >>>> Thus expected of you, Bruce.
>
> >>> Non sequitur, Dickless, and rather ironic given that you are the one
> >>> evading me questions.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > "Clasic" evasion,
>
> I'm well aware that you didn't answer my questions, which constitutes
> evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.
>
> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

Who is "Malloy", Dickless? And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

> >>>>> No surprise there, really.
>
> >>>> Your ongoing evasion is indeed no surprise, Bruce.
>
> >>> On your part,
>
> >> Non sequitur.
>
> > "Clasic" illogic.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Dickless.
>
> >> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Note:  no response.
>
> >>> Now, what does that have to do with coloured text in DeScribe,
>
> >> The subject line says "Malloy digest", Bruce.  Still suffering from
> >> reading comprehension problems?
>
> > It says "Is Dickless a complete idiot?",
>
> Classic dishonesty on your part, Bruce.

You mean on your part, Dickless.

<snip> Ooops! That's all there was!