🚀 go-pugleaf

Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:

>Bruce and/or Sheila AKA ah wrote:
>> Phillip Kyle wrote:
>> > Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
>> > news:301020051731448258%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
>> >
>> >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>> >>>> Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
>> >>>> news:301020051223308566%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>> >>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
>> >>>>>>>>> news:hkF8f.5076$ti.1298@trnddc02:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bruce and/or Sheila AKA ah wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > \ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>Art Deco wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The eCS Guy writes:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The TholenBot wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "The TholenBot", eCS Guy?  Suffering from
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Esther Schindler writes:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> I've moved on.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Obviously not from comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Reading comprehension problems,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Obviously not, eCS Guy, given that Esther clearly hasn't
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> moved on from the OS/2 newsgroups.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > tholenbot?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "tholenbot", eCS Guy?  Still suffering from
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Where did she claim to have left c.o.o.a?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> She claimed to have moved on, eCS Guy, and I noted that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> she obviously hadn't moved on from comp.os.os2.advocacy,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> which ought to be obvious to anyone with decent reading
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> comprehension skills.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > What she (but not you nor Larry Chauvet nor Eddie
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > LeTard nor the other losers here) has moved on from is
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > cheerleading a dead OS.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition that the OS is dead.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > It's been dead since around 1998,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > and now IBM is offically burying it.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Finally.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The basis that I make this claim from is the fact that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > IBM has barely, grudgingly supported it the last 10
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > years or so.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, Serenity continues to market it.  Reports of
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> its death are greatly exaggerated.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Warp 4 was rushed out and then basically abandoned.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Now all of IBMs attention in the PC space - such as it
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > is - is focused on Windows and Linux.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> evidenced by the fact that IBM sold its PC division to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Lenovo.  IBM has effectively left the PC space.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > No classic invective, no false claims, just facts.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Feel free to have the last word,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The last word is irrelevant, eCS Guy.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > because I will not reply to you again.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Famous Last Words.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > I have no desire to get into a line by line, word by
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > word pissing match
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Then why did you post a response in the first place, eCS
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Guy? Classic inconsistency.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > with a brain-dead robot that obviously has too much
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > time on it's hands.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>> Shuddup, kook.
>> >>>Shuddup, kook.
>> >> Shuddup, kook.
>> > Shuddup, kook.
>> Shuddup, kook.
>Shuddup, kook.
Shuddup, kook.