🚀 go-pugleaf

Bruce and/or Sheila AKA ah wrote:
> Phillip Kyle wrote:
> > Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
> > news:301020051731448258%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
> >
> >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
> >>>> Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
> >>>> news:301020051223308566%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
> >>>>
> >>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
> >>>>>>>>> news:hkF8f.5076$ti.1298@trnddc02:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Bruce and/or Sheila AKA ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> > \ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The eCS Guy writes:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The TholenBot wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "The TholenBot", eCS Guy?  Suffering from
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Esther Schindler writes:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> I've moved on.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Obviously not from comp.os.os2.advocacy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Reading comprehension problems,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Obviously not, eCS Guy, given that Esther clearly hasn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> moved on from the OS/2 newsgroups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > tholenbot?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "tholenbot", eCS Guy?  Still suffering from
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Where did she claim to have left c.o.o.a?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> She claimed to have moved on, eCS Guy, and I noted that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> she obviously hadn't moved on from comp.os.os2.advocacy,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> which ought to be obvious to anyone with decent reading
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> comprehension skills.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > What she (but not you nor Larry Chauvet nor Eddie
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > LeTard nor the other losers here) has moved on from is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > cheerleading a dead OS.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition that the OS is dead.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > It's been dead since around 1998,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > and now IBM is offically burying it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Finally.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The basis that I make this claim from is the fact that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > IBM has barely, grudgingly supported it the last 10
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > years or so.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, Serenity continues to market it.  Reports of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> its death are greatly exaggerated.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Warp 4 was rushed out and then basically abandoned.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Now all of IBMs attention in the PC space - such as it
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > is - is focused on Windows and Linux.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> evidenced by the fact that IBM sold its PC division to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Lenovo.  IBM has effectively left the PC space.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > No classic invective, no false claims, just facts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Feel free to have the last word,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The last word is irrelevant, eCS Guy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > because I will not reply to you again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Famous Last Words.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > I have no desire to get into a line by line, word by
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > word pissing match
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Then why did you post a response in the first place, eCS
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Guy? Classic inconsistency.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > with a brain-dead robot that obviously has too much
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > time on it's hands.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> > Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
> >>>>> Shuddup, kook.
> >>>> Shuddup, kook.
> >>>Shuddup, kook.
> >> Shuddup, kook.
> > Shuddup, kook.
> Shuddup, kook.
Shuddup, kook.

> -- 
> ah