🚀 go-pugleaf

Phillip Kyle wrote:
> Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
> news:301020051731448258%art_deco@127.0.0.1: 
> 
>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>>>> Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
>>>> news:301020051223308566%art_deco@127.0.0.1: 
>>>> 
>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
>>>>>>>>> news:hkF8f.5076$ti.1298@trnddc02: 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Bruce and/or Sheila AKA ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> > \ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The eCS Guy writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The TholenBot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "The TholenBot", eCS Guy?  Suffering from
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Esther Schindler writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> I've moved on.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Obviously not from comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Reading comprehension problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Obviously not, eCS Guy, given that Esther clearly hasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> moved on from the OS/2 newsgroups.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > tholenbot?
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "tholenbot", eCS Guy?  Still suffering from
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Where did she claim to have left c.o.o.a?
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> She claimed to have moved on, eCS Guy, and I noted that
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> she obviously hadn't moved on from comp.os.os2.advocacy,
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> which ought to be obvious to anyone with decent reading
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> comprehension skills.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > What she (but not you nor Larry Chauvet nor Eddie
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > LeTard nor the other losers here) has moved on from is
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > cheerleading a dead OS. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition that the OS is dead.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > It's been dead since around 1998,
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > and now IBM is offically burying it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Finally.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The basis that I make this claim from is the fact that
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > IBM has barely, grudgingly supported it the last 10
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > years or so. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, Serenity continues to market it.  Reports of
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> its death are greatly exaggerated.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Warp 4 was rushed out and then basically abandoned.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Now all of IBMs attention in the PC space - such as it
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > is - is focused on Windows and Linux.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> evidenced by the fact that IBM sold its PC division to
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Lenovo.  IBM has effectively left the PC space.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > No classic invective, no false claims, just facts.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Feel free to have the last word,
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The last word is irrelevant, eCS Guy.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > because I will not reply to you again.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Famous Last Words.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > I have no desire to get into a line by line, word by
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > word pissing match
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Then why did you post a response in the first place, eCS
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Guy? Classic inconsistency.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > with a brain-dead robot that obviously has too much
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > time on it's hands.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>> > Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>Shuddup, kook.
>> Shuddup, kook.
> Shuddup, kook.
Shuddup, kook.
-- 
ah