🚀 go-pugleaf

Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
news:301020051731448258%art_deco@127.0.0.1: 

> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>>> Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
>>> news:301020051223308566%art_deco@127.0.0.1: 
>>> 
>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
>>>>>>>> news:hkF8f.5076$ti.1298@trnddc02: 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Bruce and/or Sheila AKA ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > \ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The eCS Guy writes:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The TholenBot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "The TholenBot", eCS Guy?  Suffering from
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Esther Schindler writes:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> I've moved on.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Obviously not from comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Reading comprehension problems,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Obviously not, eCS Guy, given that Esther clearly hasn't
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> moved on from the OS/2 newsgroups.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > tholenbot?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "tholenbot", eCS Guy?  Still suffering from
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Where did she claim to have left c.o.o.a?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> She claimed to have moved on, eCS Guy, and I noted that
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> she obviously hadn't moved on from comp.os.os2.advocacy,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> which ought to be obvious to anyone with decent reading
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> comprehension skills.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > What she (but not you nor Larry Chauvet nor Eddie
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > LeTard nor the other losers here) has moved on from is
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > cheerleading a dead OS. 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition that the OS is dead.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > It's been dead since around 1998,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > and now IBM is offically burying it.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Finally.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The basis that I make this claim from is the fact that
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > IBM has barely, grudgingly supported it the last 10
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > years or so. 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, Serenity continues to market it.  Reports of
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> its death are greatly exaggerated.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Warp 4 was rushed out and then basically abandoned.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Now all of IBMs attention in the PC space - such as it
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > is - is focused on Windows and Linux.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> evidenced by the fact that IBM sold its PC division to
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Lenovo.  IBM has effectively left the PC space.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > No classic invective, no false claims, just facts.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Feel free to have the last word,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The last word is irrelevant, eCS Guy.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > because I will not reply to you again.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Famous Last Words.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > I have no desire to get into a line by line, word by
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > word pissing match
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Then why did you post a response in the first place, eCS
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Guy? Classic inconsistency.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > with a brain-dead robot that obviously has too much
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > time on it's hands.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>> > Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>Shuddup, kook.
> Shuddup, kook.
Shuddup, kook.




-- 
Phil Kyle�  

http://philkyle2003.reachme.at/

"The truly racist person is one Helene Rudlin, who admits it." 
	- Neil Barker <MPG.1c47999866a4baf798976c@127.0.0.1>

"I wonder - is there perhaps some form of cosmetic surgery we can pay for,
so that Helene can actually become a coon ?" 
	- Neil Barker <MPG.1c479b87e7a43ce989770@127.0.0.1>