🚀 go-pugleaf

ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>> Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
>> news:301020051223308566%art_deco@127.0.0.1: 
>> 
>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
>>>>>>> news:hkF8f.5076$ti.1298@trnddc02: 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Bruce and/or Sheila AKA ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > \ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The eCS Guy writes:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The TholenBot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "The TholenBot", eCS Guy?  Suffering from
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Esther Schindler writes:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> I've moved on.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Obviously not from comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Reading comprehension problems,
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Obviously not, eCS Guy, given that Esther clearly hasn't
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> moved on from the OS/2 newsgroups.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > tholenbot?
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "tholenbot", eCS Guy?  Still suffering from
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Where did she claim to have left c.o.o.a?
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> She claimed to have moved on, eCS Guy, and I noted that she
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> obviously hadn't moved on from comp.os.os2.advocacy, which
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> ought to be obvious to anyone with decent reading
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> comprehension skills.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > What she (but not you nor Larry Chauvet nor Eddie LeTard
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > nor the other losers here) has moved on from is
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > cheerleading a dead OS. 
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition that the OS is dead.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > It's been dead since around 1998,
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > and now IBM is offically burying it.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Finally.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The basis that I make this claim from is the fact that
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > IBM has barely, grudgingly supported it the last 10 years
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > or so. 
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, Serenity continues to market it.  Reports of its
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> death are greatly exaggerated.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Warp 4 was rushed out and then basically abandoned.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Now all of IBMs attention in the PC space - such as it is
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > - is focused on Windows and Linux.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> by the fact that IBM sold its PC division to Lenovo.  IBM
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> has effectively left the PC space.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > No classic invective, no false claims, just facts.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Feel free to have the last word,
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The last word is irrelevant, eCS Guy.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > because I will not reply to you again.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Famous Last Words.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > I have no desire to get into a line by line, word by word
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > pissing match
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Then why did you post a response in the first place, eCS
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Guy? Classic inconsistency.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > with a brain-dead robot that obviously has too much time
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > on it's hands.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>> >>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>> > Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>> Shuddup, kook.
>> Shuddup, kook.
>Shuddup, kook.
Shuddup, kook.

-- 
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with 
both male and female genitalia."

"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."

  -- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004