🚀 go-pugleaf

Phillip Kyle wrote:
> Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised  in
> news:301020051223308566%art_deco@127.0.0.1: 
> 
>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>Phillip Kyle wrote:
>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
>>>>>> news:hkF8f.5076$ti.1298@trnddc02: 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>> Bruce and/or Sheila AKA ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > \ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>> Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The eCS Guy writes:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The TholenBot wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "The TholenBot", eCS Guy?  Suffering from
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Esther Schindler writes:
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> I've moved on.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> Obviously not from comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Reading comprehension problems,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Obviously not, eCS Guy, given that Esther clearly hasn't
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> moved on from the OS/2 newsgroups.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > tholenbot?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Who is "tholenbot", eCS Guy?  Still suffering from
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> attribution problems?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Where did she claim to have left c.o.o.a?
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> She claimed to have moved on, eCS Guy, and I noted that she
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> obviously hadn't moved on from comp.os.os2.advocacy, which
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> ought to be obvious to anyone with decent reading
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> comprehension skills.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > What she (but not you nor Larry Chauvet nor Eddie LeTard
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > nor the other losers here) has moved on from is
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > cheerleading a dead OS. 
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition that the OS is dead.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > It's been dead since around 1998,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > and now IBM is offically burying it.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Finally.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > The basis that I make this claim from is the fact that
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > IBM has barely, grudgingly supported it the last 10 years
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > or so. 
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, Serenity continues to market it.  Reports of its
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> death are greatly exaggerated.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Warp 4 was rushed out and then basically abandoned.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Now all of IBMs attention in the PC space - such as it is
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > - is focused on Windows and Linux.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> by the fact that IBM sold its PC division to Lenovo.  IBM
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> has effectively left the PC space.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > No classic invective, no false claims, just facts.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > Feel free to have the last word,
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> The last word is irrelevant, eCS Guy.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > because I will not reply to you again.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Famous Last Words.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > I have no desire to get into a line by line, word by word
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > pissing match
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Then why did you post a response in the first place, eCS
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Guy? Classic inconsistency.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > with a brain-dead robot that obviously has too much time
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > on it's hands.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>> >>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>> >>Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>> > Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>>>Shuddup, kook.
>>>> Shuddup, kook.
>>>Shuddup, kook.
>> Shuddup, kook.
> Shuddup, kook.
Shuddup, kook.
-- 
ah